|
I guess it’s just a cardinal rule from now on, but regardless of who you
are, some comic books just can’t be movies. Because while “30 Days of
Night” is a very good vampire film, it just isn’t the best I’ve ever
seen. I wasn’t tingling, I wasn’t beaming, and I simply wasn’t
connecting to these fanged fucks from beginning to the end. Granted, “30
Days of Night” is a great chaotic vampire film that puts the bite back
into these demonic beings, but watching it a second time grants a better
sense of clarity, and it’s just not a masterpiece. Watching it again
also made me appreciate what I may have ignored the first time. David
Slade has a great grasp on the concept and narrative presented here
giving his vampires an utter sense of terror. They’re mindless, but
they’re also calculating and clever without being homoerotic and mopey
theater patrons. “30 Days of Night” is a valiant success at completely
rethinking the vampire concept, and it works for what it promises.
|
Take a land where night lasts for thirty days, a small town
in the middle of nowhere and freezing cold and it’s a recipe
for pure chaos as a sheriff of an Alaskan town is faced with
the walking undead who are merciless in their pursuit to
suck the small town dry. The dynamic appeal behind “30 Days
of Night” is mainly the fantastic special effects courtesy
of Weta who add a beautiful variety of gore and gruesome
bloodshed in the way of vicious decapitations, torn throats,
and some rather horrific vampire effects that add a new spin
to the bloodsuckers; one of the most disturbing scenes
involves an appearance by a little girl who happens to be
one of the ravenous hordes.
|
|
 |
It’s a truly unexpected and rather
disturbing little sequence Slade accomplishes; as well he also subjects
our heroes to much more difficulties when breaking the horror cliché of
one swipe of an axe taking a head off. Instead he presents the reality
that it really takes about three or four whacks depending on the
momentum and strength of the individual. Small touches like that make
“30 Days of Night” an interesting experience.
The monsters here
communicate like primal animals with screeches and screams, and possess
jagged teeth topped by their black as night eyes, and they’re a
constantly morbid sight to behold even as they massacre the entire town
in one night. Slade’s direction, while problematic, is also rather rich
in visual appeal and a great mixture of special effects with an
interesting mimic of the same desolate wasteland Carpenter gave us in
“The Thing.”
The land we set down
on is endless, it’s barren and it’s the perfect entrance for the
creatures of the dead to strike at individuals who can’t survive in a
world they can. Though the foreigners, they adapt more to the deathly
cold than the humans can and this provides a strict sense of
claustrophobia which Slade pulls off well. Our survivors have nowhere to
run, nowhere to hide and are doomed to suffer death under the cold if
not the vampires stalking their town. The performances from the small
cast are very strong, including from Josh Hartnett who plays the flawed
sheriff of the town forced to take control of the band of survivors, as
well as Melissa George who is sublime as his ex who is stuck in the town
after missing her plane, and must now fight her way through the hordes
of seemingly indestructible night stalkers. Slade makes a great tonal
shift from “Hard Candy” on to “30 Days of Night” and he provides a great
horror ride, when all is said and done.
Still though the
continuity problems, more particularly the chronological problems, are
still bothersome. Sure, there are place cards reading “Day 7” and “Day
18,” but in the end it still just feels like one night and one night
only. The thirty days of night really just feel like one whole
disastrous night that is almost never ending and while the place cards
work hard to convince us we’re experiencing this during a thirty day
span, it just doesn’t succeed too well. As well, much of the CGI effects
were sadly too blatant to really ignore, such as the massive blizzard
our characters have to walk through, and the frosted air that bursts
from their mouths when they speak. While putting disbelief on hold is
suggested, for many, it will be just too tough. As for the DVD, this has
to be one of the worst DVD covers I’ve seen in years. Why not at least
feature the original poster art as a slip case? Why squeeze in the
stars, the town, the snow, and the vampires all together? It’s sloppy
and really shoddy, and this movie deserves better.
Watching “30
Days” again, it really does manage to show its flaws, but is still a
very good vampire movie with great acting, direction and special
effects, I just wish I could buy the chronology tricks. The DVD on the
other hand has some great features, even in spite of the horrible cover
you get with it.
|