|
I didn't lead a fairly sheltered life growing up. When you are raised
the way I was, you tend to see many disturbing things, And yet first
watching "Alive" was a very interesting experience because it shook me
down to the core. Watching people eat their loved ones and best friends
is harrowing enough but having to ask myself how far I'd go to survive
in the middle of nowhere is something else entirely. We've all heard of
the Donner party, and we relive that same experience with the Uruguayan
Rugby team who found themselves at death's door after a horrible plane
crash left them stranded in the snow covered Andes where help was
literally hundreds of miles away. Losing their lives, and their sanity
the group had to rely on their faith and their strength to make it
through day by day being forced to live on rations and inevitably each
other. While "Alive" doesn't tell the entire story it does indeed force
us to question our own mortality and asks us to consider how far we'd go
to survive in a dire situation. If it came down to the wire and we were
on the brink of starving to death, would you really eat parts of your
dead friends to live to see tomorrow? While many would outright refuse
it, I think if faced with the situation we would all come around to the
option and re-consider it.
|
Frank Marshall's adaptation of the book aims to focus more
on the Rugby players rather than the rescue mission that
ensued while they were stranded. Enlisting talented young
actors like Ethan Hawke and Vincent Spano, "Alive"
chronicles the fight for survival of the Uruguayan Rugby
Team after a vicious plane crash leaves them to tend to
their friends without any supplies and are forced to watch
their comrades die slow painful deaths. |
|
 |
The pilots are burned alive, many are forced to endure gaping infectious
wounds and others suffocate in a freak avalanche. Had this not been
based on actual events, many would have been quick to write Marshall's
film off as pure sensationalism, but once you come to the realization
that most if not all of this actually occurred it becomes pretty
exhausting after to sit through. The survivors here can never seem to
catch a break and whenever there seems to be a point in their situation
where they're on the verge of making it through, there's always another
calamity on the way that just makes their situation much more tragic and
dire.
Marshall uses the landscapes of the Andes to his full advantage, taking
the scenery and implementing it to stress the barren hopeless wasteland
these poor people are at the mercy of. The film always sets us up for
hope and dashes it almost immediately and eventually the story reaches a
point where not only the Rugby team but the audience just loses any and
all faith in survival. The performances from the ensemble is quite
captivating as Marshall enlists notable character actors to portray the
principal characters while Ethan Hawke portrays Nando Parrado, the team
member who is forced to play leader when tragedy strikes the team in the
middle of the night. Hawke's performance is only one in a slew of
standout roles from the man and here he's a real standout. The power in
the story is not just the endless bad luck these poor people suffered,
but how their faith kept them going even in the face of losing
everything they held dear.
One of the many glaring flaws of this depiction is that Marshall
chooses to downplay the physical effects this disaster had on its
survivors. So while we're being told that they're suffering from
frost bite and are starving to death, they tend to look basically
clean and lean almost pulling us out of the narrative during many
instances. Whether this was at the request of the cast or the
director, the movie quite obviously plays like a typical Hollywood
production by downplaying the physical torment starvation and
sub-zero conditions have on the body. Aside from exploring the
injuries everything else involving the freezing conditions and the
effects if had on their bodies is considerably glossed over and
never quite touched on again. It can be pretty distracting.
In spite of some glaring flaws in regards to realism, "Alive" is a
pretty harrowing and rather disturbing look at the struggles of survival
in the face of certain death and director Frank Marshall directs quite a
unique film.
|