|
Dario Argento
is known for being surreal and frankly kind of weird. His films contain
dreamlike imagery and often focus on this imagery to the exclusion of
lesser matters, like plot. This isn't to say that his movies aren't
worth watching, on the contrary, his films feature some of the most
nightmarish imagery in horror history, but it's very true that his style
over substance approach is an acquired taste. This is why it surprises
me so much when his fans bitch about movies like "Phantom of the Opera,"
one of his movies that is almost universally hated and reviled. People
complain "It doesn't really have a plot and there's a bunch of weird
imagery and it doesn't make sense," as though that weren't true of
pretty much ALL of his films. For my money, I think Argento's "Phantom"
gets a bad rap, because there's certainly a lot to like in this movie.
|
The movie features the same
basic story as any "Phantom of the Opera" offering; a
deformed man lives under the opera house, he falls in love
with a beautiful maiden who is an understudy for a famous
opera singer, he eliminates the famous opera singer so that
his love can have a chance to perform, he and his love meet
and fall into a doomed romance, there is a tragic ending of
some sort. Argento surprised me by not straying much from
this basic plot outline (except of course the grisly nature
of the murders he portrayed) and he kept having stupid
characters wander into the tunnels under the opera house for
no apparent reason so they could be dispatched by the
Phantom, but that didn't really bother me because I love
Argento's high-charged gore. |
|
 |
There is a lot of ridiculousness in this
movie, and for me, what saves it is the romance between the beautiful
maiden, played by Asia Argento, and the Phantom, played by Julien Sands.
Their love is never less than one hundred percent believable (and Asia
Argento plays the part of the young maiden falling deeply into love and
ignoring any obstacles to that love as young people do). For his part,
Sands, who is remarkable articulate for a guy who was supposedly raised
by rats, plays the part of the doomed suitor perfectly, I'm not much of
a fan of Sands, but I give him props for this role because he did well.
Of course, there are many who object to this bizarre love story,
including a young man who wishes to marry the beautiful maiden, so he
seeks to kill the Phantom (which he really has good reason to do,
considering that the Phantom IS killing a lot of people under the opera
house, so the message that people want to kill the Phantom because they
don't understand him is really silly...dude, he's brutally murdering
anyone he doesn't like). That being said, the final scene of the film is
very sad and it sums up the doomed love triangle perfectly.
Where do I start? First of all, ignoring the fact that a guy raised in a
sewer by rats isn't going to be as educated and articulate as the
Phantom, forgetting the ridiculous visions the Phantom sees in the sky,
and forgetting the midgets who appear in the story for no apparent
reason, the movie suffers from a lack of credible acting by any of the
players besides Argento and Sands. Everyone else here is absolutely
terrible at delivering their lines, so it's a good thing that most of
them die before we have a chance to get too angry about this. The movie,
while I think it gets bashed more than it deserves, does tread on pretty
stupid ground for most of its running time, so it's definitely not for
everyone and it's worthwhile to note that even Dario Argento's strongest
supporters don't usually like this movie.
It's far from Argento's best film, but for my money, it's an interesting
take on the "Phantom of the Opera" story with some cool gore and some
good acting for the leads, and for that, I can't help but like it.
|