2007
Rated: R for drug use, strong language, mild sexual content.
Genre: Biography Drama Comedy
Directed By: Mike Nichols
Running Time: 1:42
Review by: Chad Jarrah
Review Date: 7/17/08
Special Features:
- The Making Of Charlie Wilson's War
- Who Is Charlie Wilson?: A profile of the real Charlie Wilson
CHARLIE WILSON'S WAR

 

A movie about politics? Booooooo-ring! Can those ever be good? JFK was a three hour snooze-fest that turned an interesting event in history into a ‘last week of school’ movie which students did their best to ignore. Evita starred Madonna as she played an Argentinean first lady that literally no one gave two shits about. Despite my previous run-ins with uninteresting films focusing on political figureheads, I decided to give Charlie Wilson’s War a chance based on a minor infatuation I have with Julia Roberts (maybe not the best reason to watch a movie, but she kinda looks like a teacher I once had a crush on.)

The film opens as Congressman Wilson is in the midst of receiving an award before his peers. The scene is complete with tear jerking background music and shots of a broken up Wilson, but promptly flashes back to the binge drinking congressman frolicking with naked strippers in a hot tub. It was unexpected, but did a good job showing me the laid back type of personality Charlie Wilson had. The movie continues following the congressman as he helps to fund the Afghans in a war against the Soviets in the late 80’s.  

Although I’ve had a bad track record with these types of movies, Charlie Wilson’s War was different – although, not bad different. The main focus of the film was on, and stayed on, the power of diplomacy. If someone were to tell me that I’d be watching something that focused on the diplomacy of war, I’d probably roll my eyes and think in annoyance:  ‘What the hell do I want to watch people talk about war for? I don’t want to hear about war, I want to see it.  Show me the guns and bombs, the thrill of victory and the tragedy of loss.’ I was wrong in this case.

The war itself was secondary to the events that led to its end. Watching Wilson and his colleagues, Joanne Herring, business woman and political activist (played by Julia Roberts), and Gust Avrakotos, division chief for the CIA (played by Philip Seymour Hoffman), go back and forth between Egypt, Israel, Pakistan and Afghanistan, kept the story rooted in Wilson’s diplomatic efforts. Also, I thought it was fitting to not play up the ‘Patriotic America’ and ‘Mission Accomplished’ angle up too much towards the end when Wilson’s goal was reached. After all, the U. S. reached their goal by allowing the Afghans to risk lives and do the dirty work on their behalf.

The acting was generally good, but the interaction between Hoffman and Hanks was the high point of the entire cinematic effort. They played off of each other like the seasoned vets they are and the movie probably would not have been as watchable had they not been cast.

History buffs may have a problem with the watered down version of the actual events. I was happy to not be bogged down with the thousands of details, but I could see why it may cause a problem to die hard historians. This was the first movie of its genre that I’ve ever watched that was less than two hours in length which most likely had to do with the lack of specifics.

Also, Julia Roberts in the role of Joanne Herring kinda scared me a little. She looked like a character straight out of ‘The Great Gatsby’ with her haughty laugh and thick, caked-on makeup. She made me feel like I wasn’t good enough to watch her fancy movie and that I should return to something more on my level, perhaps the Ernest Goes to Camp series.

I liked the movie and it was good to learn a little more about a part of history that I only knew bits and pieces about. It wouldn’t be the type of film I would watch again and again, but definitely would have done a better job keeping me focused on the movie and not a squirrel running up a tree outside room 113 had it been played in history class back in my day.

 

 

Have something to say about this review? Pop on over to Cinema-Lunatics
and speak your mind in our
Answer Back! Forums >>

 


[   Link to Us   |   FAQ   |   Top^   ]
All written reviews material and content are a copyright of Felix Vasquez Jr. and Cinema Crazed.
Content borrowed without written permission will not be permitted.

¤ ¤ ¤