2007
Rated: R for strong sexual content, nudity, adult language and violence.
Genre: Drama Thriller
Directed By: Nicholas DiBella
Running Time: 1:29
Review by: Felix Vasquez Jr.
Review Date: 9/04/08
Special Features:
Behind the Scenes of Cherry Crush
Previews

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Digg!
CHERRY CRUSH

 

It says a lot about a writer when they try to take lipstick and turn it in to a grand ol’ plot device that simply doesn’t work. Regardless of how hard writers Dibella and Root try, it’s still just a lot of numbskulls discussing lip stick and how eerie it is when in connection to femme fatale Shay. For one photographer with a penchant for young girls, he gets a bit of comeuppance when he targets a young girl named Shay who indulges him in a world of mystery and scandal, all of which he doesn’t realize may come back to bite him in the ass sooner or later. “Cherry Crush” is almost like the sequel to “Cruel Intentions” where a man’s talent for seducing young women in to his world suddenly becomes his downfall as he finds himself enraptured by the very girl he hoped to capture on camera.

He doesn’t so much rape them with his body as he romances them with his charms and soon meets his match in young Shay, a chameleonic Lolita who falls for him and then hopes for him to take the fall. I’ve never been so bored during a Nikki Reed movie before, but lo and behold I was. When all was said done it felt like a cheesy Lifetime Channel mystery film without any of the mystery or mystique that comes with even the worst of suspense thrillers.  

At least with junky twist and turn films, you can get a sense where it’s leading and know that there may be a surprise that will make your wasted time slightly worth it. With “Cherry Crush” I’ve never been so bored in my life and just couldn’t care less for the impending hook as to who here was the subject and who was the observer. As for Reed and Tucker, they’re bland, look bored through every single minute, and the entire title of the picture ultimately makes no sense. I wanted to like this, but alas, it’s a snoozer if I’ve ever seen one.

I should practically call it a “Gossip” sequel because Dibella’s dramatic thriller has no idea what it wants to be with trite moody characters, the pictures they take and a lot of insipid dialogue about lipstick.

 

 

Have something to say about this review? Pop on over to Cinema-Lunatics
and speak your mind in our
Answer Back! Forums >>

 


[   Link to Us   |   FAQ   |   Top^   ]
All written reviews material and content are a copyright of Felix Vasquez Jr. and Cinema Crazed.
Content borrowed without written permission will not be permitted.

¤ ¤ ¤