|
I'm not
going to waste time on plot synopsis, as it's a remake of a classic, and
we're all familiar with the story. 2009's "Children Of The Corn" is a
shitty remake, of the shitty cult classic from 1984. Much like Wes
Craven's original "The Hills Have Eyes," I'm not sure how the original
achieved cult status. It's a poorly made movie, with ridiculous
performances. I think it's name recognition. For "Children Of The Corn,"
it was penned by Stephen King. Another one of his shorts, that just
doesn't work for me as a feature length film. While the remake is
sub-par, at times it manages to be fun to watch. The first act of the
movie was really creepy, and atmospheric, much like the original.
|
Burt is played by David Anders this time around, a name some
of you may recognize as Sark, on J.J. Abrams series Alias.
Vicki is played by Kandyse McClure, who played in another
made-for-tv King remake, Carrie. McClure phones in a
terrible performance here. As bad as her performance, was
probably the way her character was written. She wasn't given
a purpose, other than to be a complete bitch, for what seems
like no reason. Her character is not developed, so when she
gets what's coming to her, you either don't care, or are
happy that she was dealt with. |
|
 |
I enjoyed Anders, but
I'm a huge fan of Alias, so that might have something to do with it. I
think he made the best of a shitty script though. Every other line
written for him has something to do with Vietnam. Yes, he's recently
returned from the war, but does that really have to be his entire
character? The first time they played this Vietnam flashback card, it
sort of worked. He was in "the corn" and it did seem like he was in the
jungle, so him making a reference to being in the jungles of 'Nam was
forgivable at this point, but it happened every other scene, and it
became laughable by the end.
I was fairly surprised at the level of gore, and nudity in the film,
seeing as the film premiered on the SyFy channel last year. I had
assumed that it was a made for TV movie, but apparently it was not. The
special effects are pretty good. Most effects appear to be practical.
There is minor use of CGI, but nothing that bothered me as much as it
usually does. One of the biggest problem with this flick is Preston
Bailey's performance as Isaac. I realize he was probably only 7 years
old when the movie was filmed, but his performance is so bad, that it
makes it hard to take the film seriously, as if it wasn't already a
challenge.
For the most part, Children Of The Corn is a poor movie. To be fair
though, your film can only be as strong as the script allows, and this
script could have definitely used a rewrite. It was a surprise for an
American movie to show such graphic child deaths, as taboo as that
subject is in American cinema, I have to at least give props to the
filmmakers for that.
I wouldn't recommend
going out of your way to find a copy of this flick to watch, but if
you're bored on a weekday afternoon, and Ace of Cakes or something isn't
currently on television, give it a go. There's a little fun to be had,
if you can forgive all of it's flaws, of which there are many.
|