|
This is what happens when you don’t plan ahead of time to buy tickets to
the most anticipated comic book movie of the year. You end up at
Blockbuster in line behind the rest of the poor saps who also missed out
on opening weekend of the Batman sequel, The Dark Knight.
My sister, brother-in-law and I walked
aimlessly past an overweight mother of two squatting next to a neatly
stacked pile of Goobers and Raisinets. I wonder if Bruce Wayne had
‘The Bat Cave’ updated yet. We walked circles around the ‘New
Release’ racks, shaking our heads in despair at the choices before us.
Is Heath Ledger’s performance as ‘The Joker’ as good as I think it’ll
be? I waited in line with a copy of Anthony Hopkins 2007 Thriller,
Fracture, in my hands with one question that kept resurfacing to my mind
above the countless others: Why the fuck didn’t I buy Batman tickets
an hour ago?
As much as I wanted to (and briefly did), there was no use crying over
spilled milk. I had a movie and had no option left but to watch it.
"Fracture" starred Anthony Hopkins as Ted Crawford, a wily man being
prosecuted for the attempted murder of his wife by up and coming lawyer
Willy Beachum, played by Ryan Gosling. Throughout the film, the audience
knows that Crawford did, in fact, murder his wife and watches as he
cleverly toys with Beachum in and out of the courtroom. The backbone of
the story lies on the character development of the two individuals.
Gosling’s character is young and ambitious and near obsessed with the
thrill of victory. Hopkins’ character is calculating and too smart for
his own good -- intent on finding the flaws in everything/everybody. The
director, Gregory Hoblit, sets up the two roles on a solid footing
before they meet so it seems as if they were meant to go up against one
another. I commend the director on his great set-up because the rest of
the movie fell into place as a result.
|
Hopkins and Gosling had good on
screen chemistry and the back and forth between them as they
continually tried to one up each other kept me interested in
how things would resolve. As is Silence of the Lambs,
Hopkins plays a great crazy guy (though not nearly as crazy
-- no human liver eating in this one.) He constantly would
play head games with Gosling’s character which were both
intriguing and funny at the same time. Beachum would be in
the middle of his examination of a witness and Crawford
would tear a sheet of paper at just the right time. |
|
 |
Other times, Crawford would wink at
and compliment Beachum in such a way to annoy the hell out of him.
It was really fun to watch. Although he played the antagonist, I had
a difficult time hating Hopkins’ character due to the charm he
exudes even as a villain. The writing and dialogue were stimulating
as well, again mostly from the two main characters. This movie was
one of the few ‘Thrillers’ I’ve seen where the dialogue was fun more
than thrilling. Gosling and Hopkins continuously play cat and mouse
as they talk, argue, and threaten one another. In one scene Beachum
just finishes up questioning his star witness and seems pleased with
the job he is doing. Crawford, who is defending himself horribly
thus far in the film, objects to some of the witness’ responses. The
rest of the dialogue between the judge and Mr. Crawford went as
follows (and I paraphrase):
Judge: On what grounds?
Crawford: I don’t know…I don’t know what it’s called…the
legal terminology.
Judge: Well put it in laymen’s terms. On what grounds do you
object?
Crawford: On the grounds that the witness was fucking my
wife.
Judge: Mr. Crawford!
Crawford: Well you told me to put it in laymen’s terms.
I thought that give and take was priceless and the matter of fact
nature of Hopkins’ words made it all the better.
On a side note I loved the marble contraptions that Crawford is seen
tinkering with and designing throughout the film. They look like a
glorified and much cooler version of the game ‘Mouse Trap’ and if I
had an office or a bag of marbles, I would buy one of these things
immediately.
Towards the end, the ‘twists’ were becoming more apparent, leaving
me with the feeling that I had solved the case before the characters
did. Although happy with my correct deduction, I usually enjoy
second guessing myself throughout an entire movie as to the final
outcome. This movie did not overwhelmingly leave me with this
feeling.
Had the circumstances been different, I may have given Fracture a higher
rating. But as it stands, the film was still entertaining and kept me
focused despite my resolve to stay bitter. Aside from a few transparent
twists, I enjoyed Fracture and recommend it to anyone looking for a fun
and well acted thriller.

- My sister thinks
her husband looks like Ryan Gosling.
- My
brother-in-law thinks the watch Goslings character wore, is way too
big.
|