|
This film attempts to create several intriguing characters, and it’s
obvious that a lot of effort was put into the humor, character, and
pacing of this film.
It fails on all levels. The characters are archetypes, the plot is
stereotypical, the catharsis isn’t that cathartic, and the humor isn’t
funny.
|
The basic plot is convoluted,
but essentially lines up to be a guy trying to come to terms
with his own failures in life, trying to avoid an
unavoidable dilemma per Donnie Darko with clues along the
way. Only Donnie Darko’s clues were pretty plain if arty,
and these are less plain and more arbitrary. Half of the
film, through effects and strange visuals, tries to play
like an art film, and, like most art films, fail. Low budget
movies should stick to writing, not try to pad writing with
a ton of crazy stuff. |
|
 |
This is one of those movies that tries to
pad little story with a lot of convoluted stuff. This is essentially ten
scenes that becomes twenty due to effects and odd visuals.
The ultimate resolution, that he’s trying to avoid getting shot, fails,
because he’s shot, number one, and because none of the clues lead or
indicate towards that. It also doesn’t spring from the character
dilemma, it’s arbitrary, so it’s bad writing. A good plot and character
drama always has the story spring from the elements that precede it,
which should be obvious, but I find that a lot of films, indie or
otherwise, miss that.
I find that most of these indie movies I’m reviewing lack a lot of
rudimentary understanding of what makes a plot tick, so they try and
make up for it by being avant guard. That doesn’t really work.

|