|
I like
Nastassja Kinski; she's gorgeous, incredibly appealing and attractive and a very
talented actress. One of her best films is "American Rhapsody" where she so
elegantly portrayed a fifties housewife. Roger Daltrey was a part of arguably
the greatest rock band ever created, "The Who". Being a hardcore fan of their
music and rock in general, I'm always interested in what movies he's in. Why is
this such a hackneyed sophomoric cookie cutter thriller with two good actors on
board? Maybe it's because of the immensely recycled plot which attempts to
become a remake of the Hitchcock masterpiece "Rear Window".
There's even
elements here that borrow from that movie, but this doesn't compare to that.
What Hitchcock had over this film was simply that he was a genius director. He
knew how to perfectly convey mood and atmosphere, he knew how to play with the
audience's nerves, and knew which cords to pull in the fright department. He was
the master and we were his puppets used in his game of horror. ".Com for Murder"
and director
Nico Mastorakis (Blind Date, Sky High,
In the Cold of Night) fails in every aspect
of what may have been a good horror film.
This film is so laden with attempts at
borrowing from other films, its original product is lost in the process. Heck
even the high tech computer system the characters use in the film is called HAL
which is another attempt at winking an eye at the super-computer from the
masterpiece "2001: A Space Odyssey", but the name is such a blatant reference it
becomes distracting. The story written by Nico Mastorakis and Phil Marr dabbles
heavily not only in clichés but in the illogical as well, often sparking many
questions. When Sondra Brummel's husband goes away, she instantly begins probing
into his online account from a love connection website to see if he may be
cheating. Wouldn't the fact that he's registered with a love website be a clue?
Why does she seem so permissive in
the beginning knowing he's engaging in this website then attempt to see if he
may be cheating on her? Why does he have such a ridiculous password which she
happens to conveniently guess? The killer Werther is broadly based for such a
film and never makes his mark in the story. He may or may not be wealthy because
he has high tech equipment, but it's never touched on. He awkwardly quotes the
story "Faust" in many parts of the film that seem to have no true importance or
relevance other than to proclaim him as a possible genius.
Why does Werther film his murder
online live and send it to the people who are intent on capturing him? Jeffery
Dean hams it up big time during the course of the film and either under-acts or
over acts his role. Like a lot of these films, the
director attempts to make computers interesting. He attempts to make sitting
down in front of a screen while typing look like an adventure and feat. He does
this by inserting badly dubbed voices posing as computer voices, bright neon
lights and a lot of rapid fire graphics.
The killer Werther has a glow in the
dark neon computer keyboard along with finger lights that shine down on the
keys. Also in a far-fetched idea, the hacker Werther is able to hack into
Sondra's computer, access ID's and control her computer while implanting
animated text on the chat rooms. It's highly improbable to do such a thing with
a computer and the internet. There are characters played by people that don't
particularly fit their roles; Nicolette Sheridan is wasted along with Roger
Daltrey who has a few minute role in the film and disappears, and has been Huey
Lewis plays a gruff police officer.
Ouch,
this is a bad film full of contrivances, clichés, plot holes, and lapses in logic that bombard
a terrible cookie cutter story and hackneyed direction. The only consolation is
the adorable Nastassja Kinski.

|