|
DOWN WITH LOVE
|
||||||||||
|
Barbara Novak is a brutal young go-getter, a tough ballsy female writer for a magazine, a female pioneer in a male dominated society who has written a book called "Down with Love" which breaks down and analyzes all the tricks men pull with women, but can't get it published, hell, she can't even get it read by publishers, Catcher Block is a womanizing irresistible playboy reporter who goes on assignments alone, but comes back with women and a story. When Barbara manages to convince a friend of hers to get her book promoted on the Ed Sullivan show, her book is on demand and published becoming an instant worldwide hit with women everywhere in the process ruining men's habits with women, including Catcher whose black book is suddenly thinning down with his former mistresses no longer wanting to see him. Angered and intent on contradicting Barbara by making her fall in love with him, Catcher poses as a naive young Southern astronaut named Chip Matthews and begins to wine and dine Barbara determined to romance her and break her heart, but he soon finds it isn't as easy as it looks. This has the makings of a really smart, funny, and clever satire, but it just goes downhill and goes about it all wrong. It's never amusing, often very corny and cheesy, and is just mind-boggling at times. With stars on the top bill like Renee Zellweger, Ewan McGregor, David Hyde Pierce in the Tony Randall role, the late Randall who was in all the Novak-Hudson comedies makes a cameo here in his last role, and with such amazing cinematography, where does it all go wrong? Simply put, it tries too hard to be cute. It has a lot of room to poke fun at these romantic comedies of the past, but it's just superficial. For a film with so much in its corner I found it hard to believe that it would fail so much. It has so much potential to be clever but it's goofy, it can be smart but is just obvious, and the dialogue can be witty but is just trite. With incredible scenery, beautiful costumes, and color practically everywhere, it became very hard to get past the beauty and into the core of the film which is really just a hollow center with fancy coating. While the story is the classic battle of wits between the sexes that never really gets old, there's nothing to like about these two characters with utterly no redeeming qualities. Rock Hudson and Kim Novak were so charming, so sophisticated, and so elegant that they made their movies entertaining, however the two main characters are so utterly obnoxious and so miscast and out of place that you never root for anyone nor do you ever care when something happens between them or to them. While Novak is supposed to be the heroine, a feminist trailblazer of the times, I'm guessing this takes place in the sixties, she's also very pushy, very shrill, and at times just annoying. Zellweger is never really convincing as a woman from the sixties and her sensibility of feminism pre-seventies is a bit far-fetched and way ahead of its time. Zellweger never seems to buy the dialogue she's speaking in many of the situations, and it's sad to see her try with something she seems so annoyed to be in. Ewan McGregor while I appreciate his looks, and he's rather handsome, he's not Rock Hudson. McGregor is miscast very much so and his looks actually work against him. His modern features and unusually modern haircut make him look as if he jumped off of a time machine and into the sixties. He's also hard to buy as the aggressive suave Cary Grant antagonist to Novak. Aside from that he manages many times to act too goofy which in many ways diminishes his persona as the suave ladies man. While the film can be smart and clever, it has a great concept but has no idea what to do with it. And while the film attempts to be as light and fluffy as the original romantic comedies starring Rock Hudson and Kim Novak, the script is unfortunately of its time with the usual strong, tough as nails post-feminism female leads, and a story that is too risqué for its own good. While the romantic comedies were sexually suggestive, they're charming today because what seemed so extreme then, is merely timid now, but "Down With Love" doesn't know how to play that card with the potential to be funny and is blatantly out of its time period with a lot of over the top sexually explicit scenes that would have never been shown then including hints of manage a trois', and Catcher's rendezvous with a sexy beatnic, not to mention an attempt at wit with split screens suggesting many sexual positions as Barbara and Catcher talk on the phone that becomes so ridiculous and cheesy and is far from funny. When Novak is on the floor, the split screen turns showing Catcher mounting Novak, a theme so sexually suggestive that it would have made people's heads explode in the sixties. There's not an ounce of attraction to this film as well, the plot is vapid and at times so ridiculous while the two leads never romance the audience while they're romancing one another, and while the film is intentionally supposed to be spoofing or poking fun at the old romantic comedies, this lacks what they had: appeal, charm, and most importantly character chemistry. The battle between the sexes with Catcher and Barbara is so un-involving and one-dimensional. The ending of the film where the real character of Barbara Novak and Catcher reveal themselves to one another is not only baffling, but is also completely ridiculous, not to mention the explanation from Barbara which attempts to be clever is just so damn confusing and head spinning. By the end, "Down with Love" keeps trying to be cute through the credits with a musical number featuring McGregor and Zellweger singing and dancing ala the old musicals, but by then you've had enough and just want to shut off the television.
|