|
I’m not sure what
I was expecting with “Eagle vs. Shark.” I mean many critics likened it
to “Napoleon Dynamite,” and I was instantly horrified. I hate “Napoleon
Dynamite,” and in some ways, yes, “Eagle vs. Shark” can resemble it, but
hell, I liked this much better, even if my reaction to it was just
mildly amused. “Eagle vs. Shark” is a cute and competent little coming
of age story that takes place in New Zealand, and while I wasn’t blown
away, Taika Cohen wins me over enough with unusual moments of romance,
and sheer absurd one-liners that I was never bored. Upon asking for the
girl love interest Jarrod originally wanted in his party, heroine Lily
replies: “She’s a lesbian… she went to a lesbian party.”
|
One of the
bigger highlights of Cohen’s dramedy is the strong and funny
performance by Loren Horsely who is sympathetic and
absolutely charming as Lily, an awkward and submissive fast
food worker who has just been given her walking papers at
her job. But she’s intent on hooking the man of her dreams
before she goes, and surely enough she succeeds. Jermaine
Clement is the New Zealand equivalent of Napoleon Dynamite
in a sense, and while he’s funny, he’s only instrumental to
the awakening Lily experiences when she goes off on the road
with him to help him fight an old high school bully. |
|
 |
The journey of Lily
from meek outsider to blunt realist is gradual and entertaining. She
submits herself to Jarrod’s view of life and suddenly discovers that
there’s something more, especially when his family takes a liking to
him. Cohen’s film is an unusual and utterly embarrassing comedy that
features some of the most awkward moments of comedy I’ve seen in a
while. From Jarrod’s ultimate confrontation with his old enemy, right
down to Lily’s emergence as a party girl, Cohen never lets us off the
hook. But surely enough the character of Lily is fascinating enough to
keep me wondering what’s in store for her next, and Cohen gives an
entertaining coming of age tale.
Cohen seems to want to force quirkiness and idiosyncrasies on the
audience, and often times simply fails. I was never under the impression
that all of these characters were utter sideshow freaks who existed in
their own world. Instead, they seemed like merely odd people who
wouldn’t have that much of a time fitting in the real world. Cohen just
doesn’t individualize his concept from other films of this ilk and I
just felt manipulated into this mind set. As for the back stories, any
attempts by Cohen at character emphases and hinted extrapolation are
wholly under developed and bland to a fault. I never cared for any of
the characters to a degree where I rooted for them or turned against
them, it was all so middlesome.
Cohen's dramedy is a hit and miss little film with a forced sense of
eccentricity that falls flat, but is otherwise saved by hilarious
one-liners, an interesting story and a sympathetic female lead helped by
a good performance from Loren Horsely.
|