|
EUROTRIP
|
||||||||||
|
See? Three simple rules that "Eurotrip" adheres to almost as if the writers refuse to dabble in creating anything even remotely funny here. The producers of "Eurotrip" seem to want to market on the baffling popularity of the film "Road Trip" so we're given yet another road trip film, except this time it's intercontinental. Scotty's girlfriend has royally dogged him on graduation day and he's faced public humiliation during a party. Vulnerable, his pen pal Mike has volunteered to be his love, disgusted, Scotty rejects Mike, but when he finds out the pen pal is a girl, and a really hot girl, he decides to go to see her in Europe, and hilarity ensues. That's always the tagline: hilarity ensues. Well, you know who Ben Stein is? The guy from Ferris Bueller! Well, if you can remember his face during that film, then now you know, without having seen me, what my face looked like the entire time while watching this hour and a half turd pile called a "movie". While the film did manage to invoke a chuckle now and again (I'm not made of stone), all the jokes in this embarrassing farce are like Starr Jones trying to back flip: they always fall flat. From weiner jokes, to typical foreigner jokes (Oh, I'm sorry, they're *supposed* to be stereotypes, excuuuse me! Right, I'm the prude, meanwhile I'm suffering through this bean turd), to sex jokes, right down to an eye roll inducing robot duel. You read right. I mean, men acting like robots fighting each other in robotic movements? Did we just suddenly enter 1986? Not one joke brought me to tears except for when I was crying at how unfunny it was. From the beginning there are just a lot of clichés that really just didn't add up: the inept parents which become fodder for amusement, the sleazy best friend, the geeky friend, and a lot of wild characters, none of which were even the slightest of amusing. Right off, you can tell for what it's trying to go with by attempting to concoct a character from the parents, and boy what a poor waste of talent on Jefferey Tambor's part who is just in the film basically four times in very short sequences. What a horrible way of reflecting, or should I say, leech off of his talent and trying to make this a funny movie. He's turned into a tool here, and I couldn't understand why they'd hire this hilarious actor only to reduce him to a mere four hardly memorable sequences. The writers just seem to be chasing their tail around on the story which is never sure if it's a comedy about a road trip, a romantic comedy, or a comedy about friendship. Either way, the product is very uneven and hardly ever becomes what I would consider comedy so most of the time is bordering over these different areas of the genre film with elements of different films hardly making what would be considered one whole product so in the end we're never sure if certain jokes are meant for laughter or just a smile, though most of which never invoked either from me. So the writers, while bordering over
these different areas, always seem to approach a
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
| What did you think? Discuss this film at the Cinema Crazed Forum |
|
[
Link to
Us | FAQ |
Top^
] |