Baby Face:
Red-Headed Woman:
Waterloo Bridge:
DVD Set:
2006
Rated: Unrated
Genre: Film Archive DVD
Running Time: 3:52
Review by: Felix Vasquez Jr.
Review Date: 12/13/06
Special Features:
Baby Face Original Release
Robert Osborne Introduction
"Baby Face" Theatrical Trailer
FORBIDDEN HOLLYWOOD, COLLECTION: VOLUME ONE (DVD)

 

In the top notch release, “Forbidden Hollywood,” we get to see three very rare films with fantastic restoration that were deemed too controversial for public eyes and tucked away for a long time. One of the headliners of the set is Baby Face (1933). Starring Barbara Stanwyck, “Baby Face” is one of the first films to feature a woman as a raw sexual predator, and warranted being re-cut, forced to have a new ending where our character realizes the error of her ways, and had its original print hidden away until 2004 where it was re-discovered. In the set are both versions to be compared and contrasted for the true movie geek. There is the original theatrical version and the uncut version which features Ms. Stanwyck as Lily Powers, a speakeasy waitress who, in one of the main sources of controversy, bears a very close friendship with her African American maid Chico.

What also makes “Baby Face” the primary sources of such controversy is that Lily is a woman who seduces, romances, and sleeps with men, and proceeds to drop them like a bad habit, and director Green is not above the obvious sexual innuendo. He’s able to suggest so much in single scenes, take for example on the train where we see two gloves fall and the lantern fade out, and his direction is nothing short of clever brilliance. In “Baby Face,” Lily decides in order to become the head of a Travel firm in Paris she must leave home, and sleep her way to the top.

 

“Baby Face” may not seem like much of a shaker now, but it has the honor of being one of the first films featuring a woman as a sexual predator. In one rather interesting sequence, Lily attempts to fight off a flirtatious customer who gets aggressive and clutches her breasts from behind as she smashes him over the head with a bottle. As a form of revenge on the whole of the opposite sex, Lily uses every man she comes across to her advantage keeping them at a sexual grasp, and slyly proceeds to ruin their lives. Stanwyck is in pure form here giving an excellent performance as this femme fatale who uses her street smarts, and sheer sexual allure to get whatever she wants even providing a sexual favor to a conductor who attempts to throw Lily and Chico off a train.

It’s not a surprise that “Baby Face” would stir up so much rage and alarm within the censors, because the film is very ahead of its time. It’s sexual without being gratuitous, and sheer hints of promiscuity are innovative. One of more ironic characteristics of Lily is that she’s completely void of any emotion, or conscience, yet when a lover suggests firing Chico, she says in a stone cold demand “No, Chico stays.” Lily is not just a sexual predator, but one who knows how to manipulate people with Chico as her moral center. Although I'm not a fan of the redemption climax, “Baby Face,” is an entertaining and brutally devious drama with Stanwyck giving her pitch perfect precursor to Phyllis Dietrichson.

Within the set is an informative introduction with Robert Osborne, the host of Turner Classic Movies Channel, and two more films. On the flipside, we have Red-Headed Woman
(1932)
, which begins on a sweet note with the utterly gorgeous Jean Harlow gazing at the window with a wide smile asking with sheer thrill, “So men prefer blondes do they? We’ll see.” Viewers coming off from the stern cruelty of Stanwyck in “Baby Face” will be delighted to see a more light hearted comedy that’s basically reliant on the same themes as the aforementioned. The dangers of a gorgeous red head. And who can blame the men here?

Even in the twenty-first century with breast implants, and plastic surgery, Jean Harlow crossing her legs and flashing a smile is still bound to draw a gasp. Fade out, and the first day on her new job as a secretary transforms into a full on affair with her married boss. Even with a light tone, “Red-Headed Woman” is still a very risqué romance about this red haired seductress seducing her boss to infidelity, and sheer sin. The controversy resulting in the tucking away of this film involves the fact that Harlow’s devious character manages to get away with her crimes, and also appears half naked and giving sexual advances. In spite of the script rewrites’ best efforts to paint Harlow’s film as a dark comedy, it’s still a rather grim film about murder, infidelity, and even features a scene involving Harlow being beaten up, and raped. “Red-Headed Woman” is hardly worth the controversy it stirred up as a rather shrill fractured romance about a woman romancing men around the world. The character Lilian is a brutally petulant villainess, and the film hardly musters enough power to be entertaining.

As for Waterloo Bridge (1931), there’s a consistent change of pace for this film. This one is a quaint and rather simplistic piece of romance during war time that features two people for most of the film conversing with one another. “Waterloo Bridge” tells the story of Myra and Roy, two people who meet accidentally and manage to form an uneasy romance. For those entering into it blindly, they won’t see much of what could possibly cause a controversy, and compared to the other two films featured, it’s rather non-threatening. But “Waterloo Bridge,” directed by James Whale, explores the character Myra who happens to be a prostitute. She’s a part time chorus girl who is a prostitute on the side, and only hints at it throughout the course of the story.

Beyond that basic hot topic, there’s also a scene that takes place in a dressing room with half naked women, and a hint that Myra had a few sexual rendezvous with her female neighbor. But “Waterloo Bridge” is an entertaining bit of melodrama with a set of very good performances by Mae Clarke, and Kent Douglass, and happens to feature a supporting performance by Bette Davis, in one of her earliest roles in her career. Set during World
War I, “Waterloo Bridge” is an interesting character drama with rather compelling characterization thanks to the top notch performances, and bears an interesting story of this soldier who happens to fall for this young prostitute who isn’t proud of her profession, but has to do it thanks to her living conditions. Thanks to its basic controversy, and thanks to the movie code enlisted by the studios, Whale’s film was later remade in 1940 in a more sanitized and safe picture starring Vivien Leigh and Robert Taylor. On its own though, “Waterloo Bridge” is a well acted and engrossing piece of romance.

“Forbidden Hollywood Collection: Volume One” is a wonderful set of films worthy of both analyses and pure entertainment, because the films within the set are pure filmmaking before Hollywood formed the MPAA that forever changed the face of honest filmmaking, turning it into a more commercial and disingenuous method of directing, and studio interference. The MPAA began as a corporation meant to keep the government from enlisting rules and beat them to the punch, but it backfired by forming an organization that was just as bad, and just as damaging to the art of filmmaking and creativity.

  • The prerelease version of "Baby Face" is the uncut film, the theatrical version is the cut film.

 

 

Have something to say about this review? Pop on over to Cinema-Lunatics
and speak your mind in our
Answer Back! Forums >>

 


[   Link to Us   |   FAQ   |   Top^   ]
All written reviews material and content are a copyright of Felix Vasquez Jr. and Cinema Crazed.
Content borrowed without written permission will not be permitted.

¤ ¤ ¤