![]()
|
||||||
|
You know what I wish sometimes? I wish I could have been around in the 70s, in the heyday of sleazy exploitive grindhouse flicks. I wish I could have sat in the shady theaters with the sticky floors sweating and cramped while I watched movie history unfold before my very eyes. I have to settle for buying DVDs now and watching them in the comfort of my living room, and I have to wonder if the people who saw those movies back when they were released had any inkling that they were a part of movie history? Did any of the people packed into sleazy theaters to see "Last House on the Left" ever imagine that BOOKS would be written about this movie? I'd imagine not. I mean, that movie is FAR from perfect. It's gritty and grainy, it's got bad acting and horrible pacing and unnecessary comic relief that detracts from the power of the film, and its $5 budget disallowed for the type of special effects that would have made imminently watchable. I hated it when I first saw it, but the reason I'm writing about it now is that years later, it still sticks in my mind because it embodied all the anger of the 70s, all the freedom to go where film had never gone before, all the desire to show graphic violence like filmgoers had never seen. It's a perfect example of the "grindhouse" sub-sub genre in a nutshell. It's also a movie I have to defend a lot. The shelves of my DVD case are littered with titles like "House on the Edge of the Park" and "Bare Behind Bars" and "Last House on the Left," and whenever I have normal people over to my house they end up perusing these shelves (because they take up most of my living room) and invariably I'm called upon to defend why I'd have "a movie like THIS" in my house. I find that a little insulting and I want to peruse their shelves and attack them for daring to insult my movie taste when they like movies such as "Dude Where's My Car," but really, I know that wouldn't do any good, and I don't really care what they watch. I know people have different tastes, I just get tired of constantly defending mine. I suppose it's because a lot of the movies I own make people uncomfortable. It's valid to ask me why I feel comfortable watching movies where someone is tortured and raped, but the truth is, these movies DON'T make me feel uncomfortable. They wig me out and disturb me and force me to confront things that bother me deep down under my skin, and I don't even have to leave the living room to do this. Even when the movies are throwaway trash like "Bare Behind Bars" I can't help but enjoying them and finding them hilarious in their badness. Grindhouse flicks came from a different time. They came from a time when society was rebelling and breaking away from a repressive and restrictive society and films could promise fun and sex and trash and violence and rape in explicit detail in ways people had never experienced and the residue of freedom and wild abandon is left behind enough for me to pick up and enjoy it now years later. What's even better is when I find recent movies that buck the system and offer me something I can't find anywhere else, some gritty reality or disgustingly offensive comedy that's a breath of fresh air in a climate filled with plastic manufactured product masquerading as film.
The thing that
bothers me the most though is that she used the word "pedophile"
and she wasn't even joking because she actually meant to imply
that anyone attracted to someone under the age of 18 is a
pedophile, never mind that even this insanity is a huge leap
from saying that everyone who watches "The Girl Next Door" is
watching it to get off, in fact, never mind any logical argument
at all, let's hurl insults and refuse to analyze what we're
actually saying. I always get distracted when I hear people say
things like this and I invariably end up pointing things out
like how the legal and medical definition of pedophilia concerns
people who are attracted to someone who hasn't yet reached
puberty and therefore can't apply to someone who watches "The
Girl Next Door" since the actress in that movie is eighteen, and
I somehow never get further than that before people shut down
and then someone gets all snippy and pissy and says "that's just
semantics." Well, yes, since "semantics" is the study and
understanding of what words mean, both denotatively, as in the
dictionary definition of words, and connotatively, as in what
words personally mean to individuals or groups of people, I
suppose me pointing out that you're using the wrong word to be
inflammatory and get attention would be "semantics," but that
doesn't automatically negate my argument. People who don't know
how to debate need a list of stock phrases to hurl at their
opponents when they make valid points, so they use the old
favorites like "that's semantics" and "you're comparing apples
and oranges" and the like instead of trying to understand what
the other person is really saying.
"Wow, people think
I'm cool AND I get to feel like I've won! This is awesome!" It
irks me. If people don't want to talk to me anymore, they should
just say "I don't want to talk about this anymore" or "whatever,
I still disagree." That's fine. I'm really not trying to get
people to agree with me when I ramble about my obsessions like
movies (why would I need other people to agree, I already know
I'm right, haha) I'm just talking because like you, I love
spouting off about my favorite subjects. I realize people will
disagree with me and I don't understand their views some of the
time, but I'm fine with them, I can listen to someone with whom
I disagree and it doesn't bother me. But don't try this
underhanded bullshit, debasing me and my enthusiasm and my
argument with empty phrases that don't mean anything. That's
annoying, immature, and rude. It knocks the wind out of my sails
and I HATE that.
|
||||||
|
Reproduction and reprinting should only occur with
express written permission |
||||||
|
Have something to say about this article? Pop on over to Cinema-Lunatics
|
||||||
|
|
|
[
|