1970
Rated: Unrated
Genre: Drama Horror
Directed By: Michael Armstrong, Adrien Hoev
Running Time: 1:36
Review by: William Garcia
Review Date: 6/12/08
Special Features:
Audio Commentary With Director Michael Armstrong
Fear And Loathing In Australia: Interview With Star Udo Kier
The Devil's Torturer: Interview With Star Herbert Fux
Burn, Gaby, Burn!: Interview With Star Gaby Fuchs
The Devil's Assaulted: Interview With Star Ingeborg Shoner
Theatrical Trailer
Radio Spots
Poster & Still Gallery
HEXEN BIS AUFS BLUT GEQUALT

 

Originally made to cash in on the popularity of the 1968 Vincent Price classic “The Witchfinder General,” Mark of the Devil not only ended up out grossing that film at the box office but has gained a notorious reputation that makes it infamous to this very day. The first film to be “Rated V for Violence,” the German made Mark of the Devil famously offered vomit bags free to paying customers for those with too weak stomachs to take the atrocities shown within the movie.

Great publicity and showmanship aside, Mark of the Devil may not be “Positively the most horrifying film ever made” as it proclaims, but may have been one of the most horrifying made for its time. Based on an original script by director Michael Armstrong, controversy exists over just how much was filmed by Armstrong and how much was secretly filmed by producer Adrian Hoven. Hoven and Armstrong’s intense dislike for each other is a matter of public record, but unsubstantiated claims have been made that Hoven cut down Armstrong’s script about witch hunters so he could insert his own ideas.

The movie itself is almost an exercise in endurance. While authentic Austrian locations were used, and add incredibly to both the atmosphere and believability many critics have savaged the film as being too violent to be above anything but garbage and have called the movie senseless and too full of exploitative themes to be taken seriously while dealing with such a notoriously misunderstood infamous time in human history.  

Not content to just explore the themes of accusation and witch hunting, the film presents the whole society as a kingdom steeped in sexual depravity and debauchery. The performances are incredibly strong in this film with more dedication and effort than any of the negative reviews would have you believe possible. Udo Kier and Herbert Lom shine as the fanatical witch hunter and his Lord, and the supremely weird Reggie Nalder, maybe best known to most casual viewers as the Nosferatu-like vampire Barlow in Tobe Hooper’s 1979 television mini-series adaptation of Stephen King’s “Salem’s Lot.” To whet their appetite for violence, the despicable Lom and Nalder indulge in all types of torture of beautiful women, all in God’s name. The pomposity of the Catholic Church is exploited to its full extent as the torturers believe they are justified and beyond reproach since they are doing God’s work, which is a poorly constructed excuse to mask their almost insatiable desire to inflict pain and their unquenchable blood lust.

While dwelling on the sensational ad campaign for the movie or the notoriety it received after its release mot detractors fail to realize, or possibly refuse to acknowledge just how well made the movie is, especially despite all the behind the scenes drama that occurred. The movie is beautifully photographed, with the locations almost pristine in their beauty. The almost Gothic interior sets look like they could have come straight out of a period Mario Bava film. The baroque music by Michael Holm is hauntingly beautiful and just like with Riz Ortolani’s amazing score for Ruggero Deodato’s “Cannibal Holocaust” it is hard to believe that such a mean spirited, scandalous shock film steeped in gore and controversy could offer up such a stunning score. The music almost is too pretty to be used here, but none the less sets the mood perfectly and adds so much to the experience of Mark of the Devil.

Even the notorious scenes of gore that have had censors everywhere up in arms owe more to reputation than actual execution. While shocking for its time, by today’s standards the effects while still packing a flinching emotional punch due to the context of which they take place look pretty tame and cheap. Fortunately this is not a deterrent for those seeking a strong, emotional and stomach knotting piece of classic horror cinema.

Some movies gain reputations that are completely unfounded, but Mark of the Devil does live up to the legacy it has left behind. One of the most famous pieces of exploitation, Mark of the Devil trail blazed through theaters and left audiences gasping for breath. No matter how many times you view this movie, none will affect you like the first.

 

 

Have something to say about this review? Pop on over to Cinema-Lunatics
and speak your mind in our
Answer Back! Forums >>

 


[   Link to Us   |   FAQ   |   Top^   ]
All written reviews material and content are a copyright of Felix Vasquez Jr. and Cinema Crazed.
Content borrowed without written permission will not be permitted.

¤ ¤ ¤