|
I'm sure by now you've heard of this movie. I think it's safe for me to
review it now that the craze and hype and backlash against the movie is
mostly over and my review won't be lumped in with all the fawning
reviews that pretended that "Wolf Creek" was something new and that
"Wolf Creek" was flawless and all that other rot. I don't pretend any of
those things. I saw the movie and immediately pegged it as neo-grindhouse
and thus knew what I was getting into. I knew there would be stupid
scenes that insulted my intelligence and pissed me off and I knew there
would be enough extreme violence to make it worth my while and I knew
that the violence would be gritty and realistic enough to make me
cringe. The movie delivered on every count and I can honestly say that
to this day, I love it for what it is, not for what it was hyped up to
be. This movie caused quite a stir when it was first released, as you
can imagine. It's a tale of three friends (or rather two friends and a
random guy they picked up along the way) on a road trip across the
Australian outback heading home. It takes literally an hour for anything
ominous to happen and when it does, it's pretty poorly done. I don't
think it's spoiling anything to tell you that while the friends are
sightseeing their car breaks down and their watches all stop and they
think something supernatural is going on.
|
This element has no business
being in the movie at all. It's annoying and it's obviously
a red herring meant to distract audiences who don't know
what's going to happen in the movie. By now I think everyone
knows what this movie is basically about, so I don't think
there's any need to pretend anything supernatural is
happening here, and I wish the scene would have been edited
out of the DVD release because it didn't fool me. |
|
 |
We've gotten to know the three main
characters for an hour and so we care about them and when they
decide it's a good idea to let a strange man tow their car
3923903490243902 miles away from civilization we want to scream at
them not to go. Of course they don't listen to us and soon they're
cut off from the rest of the world trapped on this man's property
and very bad things start to happen. When I first heard about 'Wolf
Creek" I thought it might be a werewolf movie. Allow me to spoil
something again. It's not. It's purely psycho killer mayhem, and the
torture scenes are well done, at least from my estimation. The look
a little too real for comfort. Someone is nailed to a cross, someone
is hung by her wrists and slashed with a knife while she screams and
her captor calls her a cunt, someone's spine is severed, leaving her
alive and aware but completely paralyzed, someone is shot in the
head, someone else is shot in the back and then in the head. It's
all very mean spirited and nasty just like I would expect from a
good little grindhouse baby, and these scenes bothered me in all the
right ways and thus the movie impressed me for having the balls to
go all the way with the violence and not care about plot conventions
or letting people live just because the audience was rooting for the
characters.
I love how every psycho killer is also psychic and can therefore
know which car someone is going to climb into for escape and thus he
can plan ahead and be in the backseat of that particular car even
when there are hundreds to choose from. I love how one character
says "we don't have time to look for our friend!" and then spends at
least twenty minutes perusing the killer's belongings and watching
videos of his victims. Way to be a winner there. Your compassion is
astounding. I love how the ending of this movie is really really
stupid and it expects us to think that everything in this movie
happened exactly as portrayed in the film because words that scroll
across the screen at the end say so. I'm not like a lot of people,
these things don't ruin the experience for me, but I can totally see
why someone would hate this movie for what it does wrong. I was so
annoyed when the movie started insulting my intelligence that I
almost turned it off, and I've heard people say that the movie was
long and boring (which it is if you don't like the characters the
way I did) and they weren't impressed with it because the torture
was all it had going for it. I can totally see where they get that
perspective, because if you don't like the main characters or you
stop caring about them because they're so stupid, you're in for a
l-o-o-o-o-n-g ride.
I can also see why someone would be so disturbed by this movie that they
freak out. The killer isn't caught at the end, and the killings
themselves are so methodical and cruel and violent and nasty that Roger
Ebert famously panned the film and said that if someone you know wants
to see this movie his advice was "don't know that person no more." In
fact, one of my friends who is pretty suggestible and delicate wanted to
watch this movie and I told her not to because I knew it would really
mess her up, and she ignored my advice and watched it, and then she
stopped talking to me for a month because she said she needed time away
from me and my "horror movie obsession." Bitch listened to Ebert.
This movie doesn't hold back, and while it doesn't have a whole lot more
to offer other than grueling torture scenes, I say, so fucking what? So
what if I LIKE watching torture scenes when they're done well? I know
it's not for everyone and that's fine, but where did this stigma come
from that there's something wrong with me because I have different
tastes? I understand differing opinions but if a movie is so sickening
to watch that it can split up friendships... wow, that's pretty cool,
isn't it? I mean, that shows what power the movie has, what power the
scenes have, and even though I wish the filmmakers had used that power
to make the REST of the movie as intriguing and worth watching as the
torture scenes, hey, I'm glad I got to see something that powerful
firsthand. I recommend you watch it, but don't go in blind, know what
you're in for, know the bad and the good, and then see if it intrigues
you as much as it does me.
|