|
"Horror is the future. And you can not be
afraid. You must push everything to the absolute limit. Or else life
will be boring.
People will be boring. Horror is like a serpent; always shedding it's
skin, always changing. And it will always
come back. It can't be hidden away like the guilty secrets we try to
keep in our unconscious."
- Dario Argento
Horror has become the dominant force in my movie purchases, movie
viewings, and movie contemplations simply because I was introduced to
the genre as a child and because they're fun to watch. I seek out every
horror movie there is, good or bad. I first saw "Night of the Living
Dead" when I was seven, and it was horrifying. I have nothing but a
petrifying fear for zombie movies. I’ll watch whatever horror movie you
want me to, but I’m scared shitless of zombie films no matter what film
and when it was made. My first glimpses of the walking dead feeding on
an arm, chewing off the flesh scared me and it was the most shocking
thing I’ve ever seen. Just talking about it makes me look over my
shoulder in fear.
I
first saw Creepshow when I was very young; this movie is quite a novelty
for the way it approaches horror like an old EC comics issue with panels
and word bubbles. EC made the best comics ever and they were shot down
by some pompous ego-maniac who declared comics as the leading cause of
homosexuality and violence in America. “Creepshow” is a fun exploration
of horror with stories of death, loneliness, marital woes, extra-marital
affairs and bugs with that added sick twist. What do you expect from
George Romero and Stephen King? And then there was Halloween which I
laid my eyes on when I was a boy. I can remember looking on in horror
and being frightened at Michael Meyer's blank face and white mask he
used to cover his true face. We only get a glimpse of his face in the
original film, but who needs to see him when he's dressed in his white
mask and overalls?
I
remembered getting chills whenever Carpenter would amp up the score
whenever he stalked someone, and I remember being frightened to tears in
the great scene where Curtis’ character is running from Michael and he’s
slowly following her as she tries to get into her house to escape, and
that ending where Loomis looks down and Michael Meyers is gone is still
a scene that gives me goose bumps. We get Loomis looking down and
sighing in disappointment, the ground vacant of Michael, and then we cut
to Curtis crying. She doesn’t have to be told what just happened,
because deep in her heart, she knows the boogey man isn’t dead, and then
we follow a montage of short sequences exploring the dark corners of
Haddonfield, then we explore the Meyer’s house as Michael breaths ever
so lightly in the background and as a final touch Carpenter adds the
pumpkin which is blown out in the darkness, but by whom? All of which
were new exciting and horrifying experiences for me, but they only
helped my unhealthy addiction to horror. I was never something simple
when Halloween came around. I always anxiously awaited the holiday to
arrive so I can dress up as something monstrous. I was always a devil, a
monster, or Jason Voorhees. More times than none, I was Jason Voorhes.
Try
to imagine a short skinny kid with an oversized Jason mask on his face,
a blue NY Yankees jacket, brown jeans, and a gray rubber machete. Then
every year I'd alternate, one year I painted blood on the mask, then one
year my dad spray painted blood on my pants, and another year I took one
of those small rubber snakes you could get in the quarter machines in
the supermarket and taped it on the inside of the mask with its face
sticking out through the eye hole. People loved it. Yes, I'm one of
thousands and my love for horror movies is rather passionate, in fact
many of my movie reviews of horror movies are, I’ll be the first to
admit, rather lenient because it's hard to not have a bias towards
something when reviewing a movie, because horror is just excellent to
put it simply, I have a soft spot for the genre and the wizards can give
you frights, wizards like John Carpenter, George Romero, Dario Argento
(Check out “Profundo Russo”), Lucio Fulci, and—Alfred Hitchcock.
Hitchcock once said, "Always make the audience suffer as much as
possible", which eventually attributed to my love for his art. His
horror films are different kinds of horror films; his explore the inner
depths of human fears and the darkness of our soul. He’s made espionage
movies and a few dramas, but his horror films are the best. He has the
formula to stretch out a tense sequence for as long as possible. People
will get scared with the jolt of horror, but if you stretch it out long
enough you leave the audience edgy and tense and irritable. Put a kid
with a bomb on a bus, he doesn’t know he’s holding a bomb and have him
have to deliver it before time runs out. The bus is stalling, the stop
lights are going off, people are stalling the driver and you will
definitely be at the edge of your seat. Hitchcock was, as many agree, a
genius.
He
explored nature versus man, death, murder, espionage, and the notion
that our loved relative may not be who we think they are after all. A
lot of Hitchcock’s films are great, but my three absolute favorite films
of all time from are “Strangers on a Train”, “Psycho”, and “Rope”. These
are the three films in his filmography that really resonated with me.
“Strangers on a Train” is a claustrophobic thriller about a man forced
into an impossibly inescapable situation. One man offers the other to
exchange murders and no one will be none the wiser and while he refuses
the murder is committed and now he has no real way to prove his
innocence, it’s a sharp and taut film that Hitchcock perfects with
emotions of terror and desperation against impossible odds.
“Psycho” is a sheer masterpiece and the original slasher about a woman
who steals money from her bank and flees town stumbling upon a motel on
a dark and stormy night, The “Bates” motel. She befriends Norman Bates,
a shy mama’s boy who displays a sense of rage within his love for his
mother and most likely bears an Oedipus complex as well. This movie was
marketed by Hitchcock who would not let movie-goers go into the movie
halfway in theaters even if they paid for the ticket; it’s a daring
stunt that would never be pulled today. Shocking, dreary, and dark this
thriller is truly scary with many surprises I won’t ruin if you haven’t
already seen it.
“Rope” is my favorite of Hitchcock’s because of his eight minute camera
experiment that never took. It’s the story of two men both aristocratic
with a homosexual-themed relationship who murder their friend simply to
see if they can get away with it. Their egos will not let them admit
defeat, so they host a dinner party with their murdered friend only
inches away. Hitchcock has a really sick approach towards this because
in this party, the centerpiece is a book case, a book case that is being
used for a food table and inside is their dead friend’s body and the
audience is aware but the party-goers are none the wiser. Hitchcock
plays tricks on the audience as people become interested in the case
wanting to open it and explore it and we’re played with in an almost
endless ride and it’s my favorite.
Any
critic who says they have no bias in their review is basically lying,
because it's hard not to lean towards or against a certain actor,
actress, genre, or director when watching a movie. It happens, and with
me it's horror movies. I love them. I love slasher films, particularly
the "Friday the 13th" films because good or bad it's entertaining. With
horror films you can't go wrong, the good ones scare you, the dumb ones
entertain you, and the bad ones make you wish for the good ones.
|