2009
Rated: R for strong graphic violence, language, and brief sexuality
Genre: War Action Thriller Drama
Directed By: Quentin Tarantino
Running Time: 2:33
Review by: Momar Van Der Camp
Review Date: 9/10/09

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Digg!
INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS

 

There are quite a few stellar performances to be found in this movie. I have to admit that before I go into a tirade. So we’ll start at the best part of the whole
movie, the actor portraying Hans Landa: Christoph Waltz.

A German actor who does splendid work in this movie, he deserves a nomination as best actor. He’s the ultimate actor in this movie and seems to act his way around the whole rest of the cast.

He’s superb. Even when all he does is talk, he still kicks ass. He doesn’t do much besides just literally acting like a menace and treating the rest of the cast like they are beneath him.

And they are.

Beyond him, you’ve got Brad Pitt as Aldo Raine and Eli Roth as Donny Donowitz and Til Schweiger as Hugo Stiglitz. They are the best actors in the whole movie besides Christoph Waltz and they just completely own this movie. They are the Basterds of merit, and they make the film a blast.
 

Hugo gets his own little recap spot to show you how much of a badass he is and you’re left wanting more.

Brad Pitt is a goofball, which is him at his best. And Eli Roth gets to play the demon of the gang, and he fits in there well.

With guest performances by Sam Jackson, Harvey Keitel, and Mike Myers, the movie has something for just about everyone.

But that’s where it all goes so horribly wrong. This is a movie called Inglorious Basterds, and they’re barely in the movie. Had it been called Hans Landa, I would have nothing to complain about.

But it wasn’t.

It was called Inglorious Basterds with the promise that this was a World War II movie about a group similar to the Dirty Dozen, and instead, I’d rather be watching the original Inglorious Bastards.

This is not the best movie of the year. Had I not seen District 9 or Moon or Hurt Locker, this could possibly be up there. But it suffers a lot.

It suffers from all of its Tarantino-isms. There is WAY too much talking, not enough scalping, and not enough Basterds.

The movie is too much like the slow sections of Death Proof when it needed to be a war movie.

This is most certainly not the best movie of the year. This is a good Tarantino movie. This is not his best, not even close. That honor goes to Jackie Brown by far. If you want to watch a war movie about talking, this is your movie. If you want to watch a war movie with war in it, stay far away from this film.

 

 

Have something to say about this review? Pop on over to Cinema-Lunatics
and speak your mind in our
Answer Back! Forums >>

 


[   Link to Us   |   FAQ   |   Top^   ]
All written reviews material and content are a copyright of Felix Vasquez Jr. and Cinema Crazed.
Content borrowed without written permission will not be permitted.

¤ ¤ ¤