|
Michael Moriarty used to be one of my favorite actors. I
grew up watching him in the first four seasons of “Law & Order” on
television, and I never knew that he was in some of the stupidest and
funniest cheesy horror flicks around. Imagine my surprise when I
discovered that he was in the third “It's Alive” movie. Indeed, he
and Karen Black, playing the father and mother of one of the infamous
killer mutant babies, give such good performances and are clearly
having so much fun in this movie that it made me want to like the
movie more than I did. Make no mistake, though, if you rent this
piece of crap at all (or buy it like my dumb ass did) do so only to
see Moriarty and Black. Don't delude yourself that the movie is
actually going to be good.
Having said that, let me discuss the only other remotely positive
thing about this movie: the scene at the beginning. The opening
sequence, with the trial set up to decide whether these mutant killer
babies should be killed, is actually pretty good. It's effective and
sad, and Michael Moriarty as the grieving father, injects enough
pathos into the scene to make it worth watching. It was established
in the first movie that the killer monster babies won't kill members
of their own families (that's how the mother can survive giving birth
to one of these mutants), then the filmmakers decided to basically
throw this premise out the window in the second movie for shits and
giggles, and now, with the third movie, it's established that the
babies will pretty much kill anyone and thus they need to be caged in
order to protect the rest of the population. Then all hell breaks
loose at the trial, the government decides to drop the babies off on a
deserted island (?) and the movie basically turns to shit.
What's bad about this movie? It's called “Island of the
Alive” for Christ's sake, what do you think? Everything's bad! Ok,
like I said, the first ten minutes are actually pretty good, but
after
the courtroom scene, it's all downhill, and I mean ALL downhill. In
fact, it's almost enough to make me want to put the courtroom scene
in
the “bad” category, because it's such a cool little scene that it
might trick the viewer into thinking that the movie is going to be
good. That's the cruelest trick of all. I know it worked on me. I
thought, “cool, this movie is going to be good” and then spent the
next 2 hours wanting to drive a rusty railroad spike through my head
in protest of what I was forcing myself to watch. While I admire
Larry Cohen for continuing the storyline of his grimy little
grindhouse masterpiece and tricking respectable viewers into
watching
the sequels, I have to be pissed at him because he tricked me, too.
|
First of all, the premise of this movie is ridiculous. Why would
the
government dump a bunch of mutants on a deserted island? That
doesn't
even make sense. But ok, let's pretend it happened anyway. Why
would
the government then send three guys in a helicopter to check on the
mutants periodically? What kind of monitoring system is that? When
it's been established that just one of these mutant babies can kill
an
entire hospital room full of people, doesn't that seem a tad, I
don't
know, dangerous and stupid? |
|
 |
Furthermore, doesn't it seem like the government would keep these babies in a lab and try to find a way to
use them for warfare or something instead of setting them loose
somewhere?
Sure, the government wanted to pay lip service to the idea that they
were being humane to these babies, but wouldn't it make more sense,
fit better with the themes of the original movie, and be a cooler
premise to have the government lie, say they were setting the babies
free on an island, and then try to keep the creatures in a lab for
experimental purposes? What, did the filmmakers not have the budget
to include a lab set in this sequel? I know the whole premise of a
mutant killer baby is dumb in the first place, but at least the
original movie had the good sense to keep the action centered around
a
believable and recognizable setting: A cute suburban family excited
about the birth of their baby and then horrified when that baby
turns
out to be a monster. The sequel took the premise out in left field
a
little, but it at least tried to keep the human element of the movie
going strong by centering most of the action around another family
shocked to suddenly have given life to a mutant baby.
The third
movie
throws any stab at believability out the window and offers us this
ridiculous premise where you'd have to be dropping acid to think it
made any sense at all.
The movie gets worse, though. Oh boy does it get worse. See,
there's
some mysterious disease killing off “the alive” (who, it has to be
said, look so stupid in their fully grown incarnation that the
special
effects have to be seen to believed) so the monsters are trying to
escape
the island and...well, I can't really say more, as that would
give away the end of the movie, but suffice it to say, scenes of
some
claymation and rubber puppet monster babies now in fully grown
bodies
hijacking a helicopter and then roaming the streets of a city make
for
a hilariously awful good time if you can manage to shut your brain
off. I couldn't do that, though, because the first movie in this
dubious little trilogy was so good that with every awful plot twist
I
felt like the filmmakers were spitting on a classic. I suppose if
you
can get over that and see the movie as the cheesy sleazefest that
Larry Cohen meant it to be, you might enjoy yourself.
Otherwise, this
movie is a horrid, infuriating waste of your time. Watch the
original
and skip the sequels. You'll be glad you did. I repeat “Island of the Alive.” What more do I need to say?
|