|
A NIGHTMARE ON ELM
STREET (2010)
|
||||||||||
|
There could have been explorations in to the psyche, looks at the variations of dream worlds, and the true horrors our own minds can inflict on us when aided by a dream demon named Freddy Krueger who has powers over our private dominions. Freddy Krueger could have transformed from a demon with clawed hands in to a really horrific monster with powers unparalleled. Imagine his claws signifying talons that could rip through reality, imagine the monster being more a symbol for our repressed demons than anything else. But what do we get here? It's a goddamn abysmal rehash that doesn't even try. It doesn't try at all, and I don't care what excuses people make for it, it doesn't try and its hack director Samuel Bayer is clearly just going through the motions here to rape this creative property and collect the rewards later on with a career built around our easy dollars. And Wes Craven is partly to blame for selling this character down the river for a quick buck, yet another reason why my disgust for the man grows. "Nightmare" is a remake that manages to water down the source material in both gore and sheer intelligence. It takes the ideas, the iconography, and the symbolism by the throat and just destroys it in a hail of quick cuts and fancy cinematography used to lull us in a state of apathy.
Is that the dream realm leaking in to reality? Or vice versa? Here there is no play on our perceptions of what is our mind and what is flesh and bone, it's just there and it's over and the writers never even try to open up the dream world to allow us to stretch our comfort zone and sit on the edge of our seats wondering what is the sub-conscious and what is true? Here even Freddy is just Jason with clunky dialogue who has no imagination or charisma that boils down to zingers like "Remember me?" and "I am now." Who knew demons spoke in short hand? His kills are conventional and boring and the rest of his new mold is based around how many times he can pop up and shock the audience for an instant and never quite making as much of an impact on them as the character has the potential to. I mean the film's preamble revolves around Freddy forcing a character to slit his own throat in his dreams, and nothing more. The script wants us to believe this Freddy is a sick demented individual, but he looks bored most of the time and just going through the motions to kill these people. He takes no zeal or lust toward their torment like he did in the original, so the audience will never feel uneasy about his presence. The characters (who we're told are in high school but look to at least be approaching thirty) are all one dimensional drones just crashing in to one another and never quite displaying any sense of depth or complexities, especially Nancy who went from an innocent girl pushed in to a humongous ordeal now a stale cardboard cut out who just can't figure how to stop Freddy without being told over and over. But she's deep and complex because she paints. Such masterful strokes of characterization only worthy of a Platinum Dunes film. As for Haley I won't cut him slack. He's a strong actor who takes up an iconic role and does nothing for him beside collect a paycheck and recite really terrible lines meant to intimidate but manage to elicit collective yawns and eye rolls from the crowds. Why does Freddy have claws again? What does the boiler room represent? What are the gaping children supposed to signify again? Why does he have a beacon signaling his presence if he rules the dream world? And how does he turn a place like a restaurant in to an element of sheer monumental horror? Why again do none of the characters actually remember Freddy Krueger? And how did the token minority character upload and post his last video if he was killed while making it? Either way when the film continued I was bored and listless and when it ended I moved on and wondered why the art of pure storytelling went to the wayside a long time ago.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Have something to say about this review? Pop on over to Cinema-Lunatics
and speak your mind in our Answer Back! Forums >> |
|
[
Link to
Us |
FAQ |
Top^
] ¤ ¤ ¤ |