|
PIG
|
||||||||||
At this current time I'm looking for a
psychiatrist for Adam Mason because if "Pig" is any indicator, this
young man is in desperate need of one. "Pig" came out of seemingly
nowhere, a film that reports explain he filmed in secret with a long
time collaborator and completed this experimental horror film that is...
well I don't know how to explain it. Mason has accomplished something
that no filmmaker has ever. He's left me without a single word to
mutter. Because "Pig" works on such a visceral level of emotions and
confusion and carnage I wasn't sure what I thought about it. Pretty much
giving the film away to anyone who will see it, Mason's film is
something that will be impossible to peg or sell to audiences. I doubt
any theater will screen it, I doubt there's a distributor that will sell
it, I don't know if general audiences will watch it, and I think even
experimental film lovers will actually be able to decide what they
thought of it. This is a film that you'll love for hating or hate for
loving, it will separate the few people that have actually managed to
sit through it and it's an experience only capable of being created by
an indie director. Mason completely destroys any and all clichés with
film. There's not a plot, there's not a lot of commentary, and the
entire motivations of the characters are just jarring at times.
One thing Mason does to sum up the experience is through his nameless main character who screams "You fucking asshole! I love him but I hate him! I want to kiss him but I want to kill him!" It's exactly how I felt about "Pig." I despised it but I couldn't turn away. I hated every minute, but I was compelled just the same. I paused the film several times to move on to something different but I kept going back just to see how it ended. Sadly the affair isn't flawless as Mason's own description of the film is quite pretentious as is his finisher for the entire narrative that ends on a question mark that leaves us to interpret the meaning and our nameless character in a number of ways. Rather than stick to the simplicity he strived for throughout the movie he goes for a complete 180 of a twist that is not only confusing but much too self-aware. The alleged "satire" is aims for is immediately undercut with the whole "more than meets the eye" plot device that off sets an otherwise unique experiment.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Have something to say about this review? Pop on over to Cinema-Lunatics
and speak your mind in our Answer Back! Forums >> |
|
[
Link to
Us |
FAQ |
Top^
] ¤ ¤ ¤ |