|
If you've seen "What Dreams May Come" then "The Lovely Bones" might
serve as a familiar film. The only difference though is that while Robin
Williams' afterlife hopping drama was quite awful, "The Lovely Bones" is
able to capture what heaven may or may not be and how it applies to the
souls of the young and old. The visuals are absolutely phenomenal with
director Jackson coasting through different worlds and various phases of
the after life that gives our main character Suzie a purpose. As someone
who's crossed over the after life presents her with various tests and
obstacles that will decide if she's willing to remain in her darkness as
someone who endured a brutal crime or as someone who chooses to move on
and live with the fact that fate will somehow play a hand in the demise
of her killer soon. Soairse Ronan was excellent in "Atonement" and gives
an equally wonderful performance here as the dreamy Suzie Salmon who has
to come to grips with the way she left the Earth. Through her wide eyes
and shimmering smile, she becomes the one link her family and friends
share after she has gone. Wahlberg and Weisz are also quite good as her
parents who take different roads in their life once the despicable crime
has worn down their relationship. Wahlberg is powerful as the father of
Suzie who must deal with the fact that justice isn't always served,
while Weisz refuses to believe her daughter is gone. The trio ultimately
make the film worth watching and Ronan simply takes the movie by the
throat and shines.
Peter Jackson is usually a very competent director. Hell, he's a
skilled director who can take any concept he wants to tackle and
tackle it with great prowess almost never failing. With "The Lovely
Bones" the man doesn't seem to be hitting his stride and instead
looks to be sleepwalking through what could have been an excellent
film. I never read the novel before but I felt that was what would
give me the ability to see through what Jackson was attempting to
accomplish. Instead what I received from his latest was a story that
was often confused about what it was trying to say. He seems to want
to jump on every theme and plot point possible and this causes a
cluster fuck in its focus hopping from character to character from
perspective to perspective. Is it a story about our perception of
heaven? Is it about a guardian angel leading the hunt for her
killer? Is it a parable about god and what our perceptions of heaven
are? Or is it more about the collapse of the family unit under the
weight of great tragedy? Neither. And this leads Jackson's opus to
feel completely genre and tone confused. It goes from dark and
gritty, to light hearted and warm, to melodramatic and sometimes
emotionally manipulative. Sure the routine aspects of a story
involving tragedy is there but it's conducted in such a haphazard
way that not even the cast can save what occurs.
|
And just when we begin focusing
on the inner workings of a pedophiliac serial killer Jackson
opts for mild comedy in the middle of the story, which feels
horribly misplaced and utterly unnecessary. Sarandon is in
the film for no purpose other than to act as a comic relief
in the lives of her family who are doing everything to find
out who killed their beloved daughter Suzie. Sadly, we get
only a glimpse of what effect Suzie's death has on her
family. |
|
 |
We
never get to the heart of their suffering and misery as Jackson
sends the story's parental unit on different paths that make zero
sense in the scheme of things while Suzie's own journey to the after
life doesn't seem to have a real goal. Is she heading for heaven or
is she doomed to endure the life of her killer and family subsequent
her murder? There's never any real indication, so like everyone else
here she wanders around in a haze while the story changes paces
frequently. Jackson's had a great grasp on the supernatural before,
and doesn't accomplish revealing the mystery and magic of it all. To
top it all, the last act is so anti-climactic building up tension
and suspense only for Jackson to completely dodge it offering
nothing more than a heartfelt moment where he completely derails all
the film was working towards from the beginning. Jackson is so lazy
in his storytelling that he treats us to a surprise in the end which
could have taken the chance to resolve the story and instead acts as
a moment of heartbreak that fails to capture any emotion and instead
invokes anger and irritation in the audience hoping for everything
to end as it should have. Suzie's ghost has one chance to end it all
and instead chooses to snog with the boy of her dreams?! So
infuriating was the final act that I nearly gave up on "The Lovely
Bones."
In spite of some incredible visual effects and strong performances from
the cast, "The Lovely Bones" is a confused genre mess; Jackson creates
strands of themes and yet never quite knows how to connect them to form
a coherent enough story. While it's not the worst movie of 2009, it also
fails to be one of the best, either.
|