|
A sequel. I should end
my review right there. But in the interest of taking up useless e-space,
I'll continue. For me, "The Descent Part 2" had two strikes against it
before the opening credits rolled. Director Neil Marshall has not
stepped back behind the camera to further his already finished story and
the sequel is a continuation of the North American ending. Now, if
you're one of the special people who were able to see the original a
year, or maybe more before the North American release, you'll know that
the original ending is superior in every way. It wraps the story up, and
fits in with the rest of the film's bleak, hopeless tone. I'm not sure
if studios feel that American's are stupid, or if we are too fragile to
handle a down ending, but whatever the case, our protagonist survives.
Found running through the woods, caked in blood, she's rushed to the
hospital. Found to remember nothing upon initial questioning, the
sheriff leading the search for the other missing girls decides the best
course of action is to take this woman-in-shock directly back to the
place that caused her the trauma.
|
Somehow,
"The Descent 2" manages to continue where the first film
leaves off, but feel like a complete cash-in at the same
time. Some scenarios are lifted directly from the original.
In the first film, the overwhelming sense of claustrophobia
was treated as a character in the movie. It's one of the
reasons the first film was so effective. Seeing those petite
women barely making it through the holes in the cave left
you feeling uneasy. This is not present in the sequel. In
fact, the sheriff is a pretty big guy. |
|
 |
The original actresses
return to reprise the roles of Sarah, and Juno, who is somehow still
alive, even though we heard her screaming while she was torn to shreds
in the first film. Apparently, in her two days of surviving the
creatures in the cave, she's become some sort of commando, hunting down
and killing the cave's inhabitants. One of the biggest problems with the
sequel is it's pacing. Here, it's as if the director just wanted to get
to the killing as quickly as possible. We don't know anything about most
of the characters, and we don't care when they are killed off. In the
original, you could tell that all the girls were close friends, and you
could tell that when one of them was picked off, it effected the rest of
the characters. Another problem I had were with some of the special
effects. It's as if the special effects team have never actually seen
blood before. When characters are wounded, we're treated with an
arterial spray of what appears to be Cambpell's tomato soup, in both
color and consistency.
It's loaded with
problems, some forgivable, some not (random, unexplained twist ending.),
but I've seen worse movies, and certainly worse sequels. If you enjoyed
the creatures in the first film, you'll probably find something to like
about the sequel, just don't expect it to be anywhere close to the
brilliance of the original..
|