|
HEAD CASE
|
|||||||||||
|
What’s most haunting about “Head Case,” is that our two culprits look like average folks on the street, and Spadaccini makes an extra point of noting this quite often, even in the opening where our couple discusses their plans, and which poisons can or can’t be tasted. This conversation and strategy is interrupted by their children calling in the background, which makes this scenario all the more gruesome, especially since Andrea seems to take such relish in discussing the taste of poisons. This entire film is chronicled by our two killers who record their traps, poisonings, murders, and inevitable cannibalism through a video as an obvious result of hubris for them to examine later. This couple is very strategic in the scenarios and traps they set for potential victims, as well, they’re very business-like in their preying as they get straight to business, and seem to approach this as any other profession. Of course, their children have no idea what they’ve done and possibly have been doing years before they were born. Spadaccini definitely approaches the horror genre with a natural finesse as the film is gritty and often times very stark with our couple feeding each other’s egos, and examining their skills while also grabbing a sheer thrill from the torture they inflict. They play with their victims and know them before the inevitable drugging, create sick games and different methods for the murders, and later on even memorize the victim’s lines and reactions and bemoan never collecting any artifacts from the murder. “Head Case” has a definite sense of humor about itself at times, but never so much that it becomes a comedy. Spadaccini strictly steeps his film into the horror genre and keeps the tension and brutality a constant, while giving us glimpses into their family life. The ensuing plot twists as the plot progresses are often very shocking, and we’re never truly given a defined set of principles or rules these people abide by, beyond enjoying the concept of death and torture.
Meanwhile, we’re given the average family motif, but there simply isn’t enough focus on their children and the family life that is a cover for their life behind closed doors; we see only one scene of Wayne and Andrea bonding with their children, and it’s much too fleeting a scene to provide the proper impact for the second half of the film where it takes a turn for the worse. Beyond that, the film is really about twenty minutes too long, where scenes tend to drag. The thanksgiving dinner scene is almost endless, the inevitable confrontation is sadly flat, and scenes of Wayne hunting on the street are almost fruitless. A good fifteen minutes could have been shaved off to where we felt a better sense of urgency, while we’re left with many lingering questions that are hardly ever answered. Did Todd ever really know what his parents were doing? And why did he complain about Wayne and Andrea’s apathy when he himself didn’t really seem to give a crap? Why would they carry around a camera everywhere they went, even during their hunts? Wouldn’t it draw suspicion? Why not bring along a hidden camera, or a camera in a bag? You figure a couple with enough know-how to cover up crimes would gather the technology for stealth while filming. Aspects like that were pretty ambiguous and irksome.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Have something to say about this review? Pop on over to Cinema-Lunatics
and speak your mind in our Answer Back! Forums >> |
|
[
Link to
Us | FAQ |
Top^
] ¤ ¤ ¤ |