|
IN THE CUT
|
||||||||||
|
With her stringy dark brown hair, obvious painted on dark circles and wearing clothes I've only seen a grandmother wear, she tries to go all out and be taken seriously as an actress, but why? She's lovable, she's charming, she's attractive and within a lot of the forced sexual scenes including one full frontal masturbation scene, and a lot of nudity, she looks like a young actress trying to prove she can act, but why is she? What is she trying to prove in this? That she can act? We know that, that she's sexual? We know that, so what is she trying to get across?
Nonetheless this gritty, droning, and overly annoying film dressed as an
independent arthouse picture that turns into a gimmick with wobbly
cameras, darkness and grime galore that makes the city look like a
jungle, so much so, there were times when I couldn't make out what was
happening, and a lot of scenes that don't really make sense, it's
obvious we There are a lot of long scenes focused on a particular object almost as if its trying to accomplish symbolism and a paradox that never works but really looks forced and trite, there were long scenes focused on one object that I tried to discover if they were symbols for anything in the film but it simply left me frustrated because a lot of the scenes with the long silences made absolutely no sense regardless of how hard it tried to, there's even this really annoying plot device in the film where Ryan's character reads a poem bit on a billboard in the train which always happens to be dictating her every move or mood.
I've been on New York subways all the time, and I see a lot of those
poems advertising a museum, but rarely are they ever so good I say
"Yeah, that's exactly how I feel!" Ryan plays
An underground world of what exactly still remains a mystery, but a
portion of the movie is Whether or not she's aware of how she comes off as a character is hard to say, but she plays mind games with every character here, she has nothing about her to like because she's bland, and has a bi-polar personality. So, she enters into what looks like sexual exploration at a club where she meets one of her students for a study session and she witnesses someone having sex, the day after a woman ends up being murdered and she begins having an affair with a sketchy cop who may or may not be the murderer. Mark Ruffalo, whom I've said before is bland, but is actually a good actor, and possibly the only bright spot in this, plays Malloy, an enigma of a detective investigating the string (there's only four) of murders. He's kind of an odd character with a lot of questionable activities and signs that he may be the murderer and somehow Franny is infatuated with him. Now, it's probably just me, but if I suspected someone was a murderer, I wouldn't sleep with them... but that's just me. Then again, it'd all depend. I mean, if it was Ashley Judd or Diane Lane... then maybe. Regardless they have a very vapid and awfully dull affair with one another and they seem to be very infatuated with each other. Again, Malloy isn't a good character; he's blunt, nasty, perverted, disgusting, and sleazy, but it's what turns Franny on. They seem to be attracted to each other, and the film continues on with this downward spiral of confusion on whether it's a drama or a who dunnit, and the hybrid isn't very appealing.
Director Campion tries very hard here to achieve some sort of artistic
impact with a lot of Now call me slow, but I just couldn't follow what the exact genre of the film was. Was it a modern noir, a murder mystery, a twisted romance, a crime drama? The film is never really sure what it's trying to accomplish so by the climax with its numerous red herrings, forced surprise ending, a plot twist that I saw coming, and a stilted last moments, I was not impressed.
|