|
It’s almost as if “Loverboy” is a twist on the relationship between
Eugenie Rose Chaney and Raymond Shaw in “The Manchurian Candidate,” and
in place of the overbearing mom this time is the lovely Kyra Sedgewick
who slips in the mantle of psychotic mothers with finesse, and looks
good doing it. And most importantly about “Loverboy,” and also the most
twisted, is that Sedgewick’s character Emily is willing to do anything
to have a baby. And through this she’s engaged in a mission not to have
the perfectly child, but to have the perfect mate that she will not let
free from her grasp.
|
How she goes about the perfect child, or one she perceives
as one, is rather sketchy, and displays Bacon’s rather odd
focus on sex and sex involving Sedgewick. Though it’s not
hard to believe why he’d focus on his wife’s enormous sex
appeal, the montages of Emily hunting for lovers and seeking
the combination of the right genes ultimately displays this
character’s lunacy right before her son ever enters the
story. |
|
 |
And “Loverboy” becomes much more of a tragic picture of a woman intent
on keeping her son in her grasps, thanks to a childhood of alienation
and homoerotic innuendos that allude to the true persona of Sedgewick’s
character in the end.
Sedgewick is very
good here, and even though she’s mainly front and center because of
Bacon’s directorial duties, Kyra often provides a strong and convincing
performance as this awfully uneasy and potentially deadly woman who will
stop at nothing to please her son and keep him at her side. She even
makes quick work of a pet bird she feels threatens the perceived
undivided attention of her son, who actually craves nothing more but
space, and time away from her.
Too often, Bacon attempts sheer art house dribble sequences that more
often than not come off flat and goofy. And when he’s not trying to be
complex, he peppers the film with terribly campy back story that often
seems to serve more as padding than anything. And it’s often times
moments that bring the story to a screeching halt, save for Sandra
Bullock’s moments that were never too relevant to the overall storyline.
When I was sure they served a purpose to the climax, I realized they
were also just awfully dull segues that did nothing to contribute to the
story other than failing to add depth and reasoning to Emily’s madness.
The scenes with Emily’s parents are often ridiculous and forced; they
seem to be there just to give Kevin Bacon something to do in front of
the camera, instead of leaving him behind the camera to let him flex his
directorial abilities.
He’s there as Emily’s father along with Marisa Tomei, and their sub-plot
ultimately adds a sense of understanding to Emily’s character, but we’re
never sure if we should fear or pity her in the end. Bacon anxiously
tries for artistic in this bloated cast and average story, and really
just comes off as campy instead; take one slow motion scene involving
Emily and her son playing air instruments in the rain. Worse more, the
acting by Dominic Scott Kay comes off often disingenuous and forced.
When writer Shakespeare often strives for Paul to be maladjusted and
smothered, he’s really just comical and stiff, and never convinces us
that he’s struggling to break free from Emily. He’s more just a petulant
little brat who we really want to smack some sense into. Shakespeare
just can never get her characters on a straight path.
In the end,
Bacon’s film for his wife is pretty average. The bloated cast doesn’t
make up for a safe ending, and flat attempts at art house and back
story. But for what it’s worth, Kyra Sedgewick commands the camera well
with her performance which makes the film an above par effort.
|