|
If there are a
few reasons why Schroeder’s “Man in the Chair” will be remembered it’s
for the competent performances from Michael Angarano and Christopher
Plummer. Angarano who is sadly pigeonholed as a Disney actor gives a
rather good performance as the troubled yet ambitious young ward to a
dysfunctional parental base who finds himself in trouble for weird and
often absurd reasons. One instance involves his character Cameron being
busted for stealing a car that looks like the car from “Christine.”
Angarano holds his own against the likes of M. Emmit Walsh and
Christopher Plummer, and he’s a bright spot in Schroeder’s drama.
Christopher Plummer on the other hand, doesn’t fail to impress. Plummer
gives an outstanding performance as a grizzled wasted old man who seeks
nothing out of life but to be tolerated, and acts like a goon whenever
he pleases. Surely enough though, he’s a lost film icon who character
Cameron takes great interest in as soon as he learns of his past.
Plummer transforms himself into this tragic man embodying mannerisms of
a decrepit dinosaur of the past, and growling at everyone with great
conviction. Plummer’s accent is rarely heard beneath his grumbles and
shouts, and he commands this film to pure entertainment. Plummer grabs
all the best scenes, to boot, and surely enough makes this a great notch
on his resume. If you have to see this film for one reason, see it for
Plummer.
Schroeder has no idea what the hell story he’s trying to tell, and “Man
in the Chair” is such an obvious mess of a tale that I was never sure
what I’d seen. What is this all supposed to be? Is it about the film
industry? Is it about the creative process? About movie lovers? Is it a
commentary about America, or just a PSA about the abuse and neglect of
the elderly? Neither and then all of the above. Schroeder tackles so
many sub-plots and meandering threads that “Man in the Chair” ends up a
mixed bag of some treats with so many duds at hand. When Schroeder isn’t
trying his best to display cinema verite moments with edgy moments of
camera work, he can manage to tell a story that really is never sure
what to do with itself. “Man in the Chair” is such an uneven and
ill-written film that I felt like I was being pulled in all sorts of
directions as the story went along. Just when I’m watching a new version
of “Scent of a Woman,” we’re suddenly thrust into a statement about the
creative process and how old artists never die, and then we’re told
about the harsh reality of the elderly in our country, when really I
just wanted to see what the plot on the website explained.
|
A young kid makes a movie with
the help of a film veteran for a contest, and yet while
we’re there to see this story, we meander along sloppily and
are left out in the cold with many sub-plots left either
unresolved or wrapped up too quickly to be believable, such
as Cameron’s tough as nails step dad finally learning to
appreciate him with the help of Flash, Cameron’s bout with
juvenile delinquency, and Mickey’s sadly unfinished sub-plot
about his struggles to get in touch with his daughter. So
many themes and plot devices are drawn for us for the
director to only visit when it’s convenient to the story,
and we never truly feel like we’re focused enough to get to
the end |
|
 |
What about the film competition?
What about making the
movie? What service did the folks at the home serve if Cameron made a
documentary? “Man in the Chair” pretends to be a take on “Tuesdays with
Maury,” when really it’s just a sanctimonious finger wagging film about
the elderly and how the American health system lets them slip through
the cracks. When the film does actually manage to grasp on to great
dialogue and characterization, Schroeder attempts to sidestep it in
favor of more finger wagging at the audience as if it were all an after
school special. Take for example a scene of Flash remembering his
confrontation with Orson Welles. Here is a scene with potential which is
ruined by a painfully over the top performance by Jodi Ashworth.
Somewhere beneath the commentary and preaching, there’s a great tale
about movie making and legends being revived for one last hurrah, but
Schroeder hardly ever touches on it, and “Man in the Chair” is left as a
sub-par melodrama never sure what it’s trying to tell us, in the end.
I
really wanted to love “Man in the Chair,” but it’s sadly just a series
of trite morals, sub-plots, and PSA’s overlapping a potentially great
story about filmmaking. In spite of it though, Christopher Plummer and
Michael Angarano pull in great respective performances.
|