|
LA MARCHE DE
L'EMPEREUR
|
|||||||||||||
|
It's much in the vein of "Le Peuple Migrateur" (except not as staged) and the old nature documentaries that aired on ABC (except not as delightfully ignorant). Yes, "March" features the basic cycle of the wilderness, life and death, live or die, the basic laws of nature. And there are some cute baby penguins in the climax. Narrating yet again is the great Morgan Freeman who seems to be very engrossed in the material he's exploring because penguins are an oddly compelling animal. They huddle together during snow storms and form little groups to keep each other warm, they nestle their babies underneath their stomachs to keep them warm, they protect one another from birds and each other, they perform an odd little dance to court each other, and they all look so damn similar after months away from each other they need to rely on sound to identify their mates and babies. But Jacquet's exploration in to these birds is also often an adorable and funny chronicle that's basically a short tale in its brief run time, but really does paint the life and death struggle of the emperor penguins as unique and complex enough for the target audience to explore with wide-eyed wonder. For the older audience, they'll be more inclined to discover the utterly excellent direction and amazing cinematography courtesy of Luc Jacquet, Laurent Chalet, and Jérôme Maison. And kids will love the way these birds act like humans, especially in terms of relationships and children, caring for them, sacrificing to take care of them, and the companionship among the tribe of emperor penguins to keep each other safe in the face of the harsh winter. Jacquet's exploration of these animals is simple, and direct, but also very fascinating and entertaining that will appeal to adults and children's curiosities.
I figured a film so highly praised would have offered something unique
and fresh to the fold, but in the end it's just fluff, and fluff that
really won't appeal to science and wildlife buffs save for occasional
nuggets that audiences will find interesting. And such proof of fluff is
how the film is narrated. Freeman is excellent, but the descriptions are
often sugar-coated. The mating rituals are featured for just ten seconds
in a non-suggestive subtle method, and worst of all, the film shies away
from really showing the harsh realities of this life; instead of saying
"die" or "dead", they replace it with "fade away" or "disappear". I get
that they don't want to sadden the audience too exhaustively, but if
this is a film about examination of life, wouldn't the examination of
death be also a natural part of the documenting? Life and death are
natural polar opposites that deserve exploration, and death should be
just as featured
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Have something to say about this review? Pop on over to Cinema-Lunatics
and speak your mind in our Answer Back! Forums >> |
|
[
Shop |
Link to
Us | FAQ |
Top^
] ¤ ¤ ¤ |