|
MUST LOVE DOGS
|
|||||||||||||
|
And most of all it follows the same formula. Woman finding man, man finding woman, woman stumbles through oddballs, woman crashes into man, they hate one another, they discover they like one another, there are typical obstacles, and the rest is history. “Must Love Dogs” is possibly one of the most artificial and disingenuous romance comedies I’ve seen (seconded only by “Failure to Launch”) particularly when it poses as one of the most blatant of product placements since “Harold and Kumar go to White Castle”. It’s sad how films like these are publicized as “the” romance comedy to come out in years since it sports big stars, walk on’s from the likes of Christopher Plummer and Stockard Channing, and a fluffy storyline, yet around the same time, there stood a film named “Before Sunset” that was basically one of the best romances to come along in years that was hardly even mentioned or known in the general public. “Must Love Dogs” is proof positive that it’s extremely tough to find any watchable romance comedies, and this was quite possibly one of the stupidest. And then there’s the basic obstacles of “the other person” which complicates our love story for only a little while until we’re back into our secure world where everything turns out as it should, during this obvious plot progression, there are also dumb gags like Channing's character meeting up with her internet suitor who happens to be a teenager, and Lane's character accidentally meeting her father for a date thanks to the online dating which defies logic since it's clearly noted that she posted her picture in her profile. If anyone ever said “I hope they get together” during any point of this, I’d really have to kick them into a freeway during rush hour.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Have something to say about this review? Pop on over to Cinema-Lunatics
and speak your mind in our Answer Back! Forums >> |
|
[
Shop |
Link to
Us | FAQ |
Top^
] ¤ ¤ ¤ |