|
You have to credit Aaron Eckhart for taking what could have been a truly
forgettable and cliche character and turning him into a love interest we
can actually admire. I absolutely loved his role in "No Reservations" as
a wonderful antithesis to Jones' snotty chef. He's charismatic, funny,
and he really does add the extra energy this movie needed from the get
go. Eckhart proves that even in the most limp material, he can shine. As
for Abigail Breslin, she's surprisingly downplayed and really turns into
a sympathetic child character who is not reduced to trite one-liners and
goofy saccharine dialogue. She's sweet and sad, and really adds
something to the movie.
Watching “No Reservations” was a lot like watching “Must Love Dogs.”
They’re sugary harmless fodder, but still I found myself offended and
was convinced that though I had no previous knowledge of it, the
original source material must definitely be better; “Must Love Dogs”
being an adaptation, while this is a remake of an Italian comedy called
“Bella Martha.” The writing is so vain because it expects us to believe
that these two gorgeous people couldn’t possibly hook up, not to mention
we all know where it’s going to go. Just the same, its formulaic
nonsense intended for the Valentine crowd to watch two gorgeous folks
get together with the belief that they have trouble holding on to a
mate. Like “Must Love Dogs,” I ask: Are we really supposed to believe
good looking people like Catherine Zeta Jones and Aaron Eckhart can’t
find mates? Hardly. Perhaps I’m being too hard on it, because actually
the film isn’t bad.
|
It’s not as bad as “Must Love Dogs” either, it’s just I’m
tired of watching movies about a ne’er do well career
obsessed woman with goals suddenly realize her life is empty
until she happens upon a precocious little boy or girl who
brings something to their life they couldn’t have otherwise
had without them. It’s this exact string of pro-life logic
that peppers comedies today, and it’s insulting to believe
that someone can’t be fulfilled or whole without children. |
|
 |
Not to mention this plot is something we’ve seen a thousand times over
recycled from television movies and the like, all of which treads the
same plot devices and sub-plots with zero effort. The interplay between
Jones and Eckhart is boring, the character played by Breslin is cliché,
and the inevitable resolution is predictable and cornball, and yet why
is it that this attracts audiences? I can’t understand it. I’ve seen
this movie twenty times in the last five years, and it was a struggle
seeing it yet again. Will Kate learn to be a good foster parent? Will
this doe eyed child bring something into her life? Will Kate fall for
the rival chef? Is Patricia Clarkson losing her mind for co-starring? We
all know it’s a yes to the fourth power. Again, it’s all relatively
harmless fluff but one that just doesn’t demand anything except your
attention while it replays the same devices over and over again. It
takes the best tries at pulling our heartstrings, but Breslin as good an
actress as she is, just doesn’t convince me to care too much. Everything
about this movie gave me a cavity and not a pleasant one. Even the title
makes me want to punch a kitten. My best advice would be to watch the
original which I’m sure is much more emotional and original. This
American remake is much too clunky and rehashed to enjoy.
In spite of the great performances from Eckhart, and Breslin, "No
Reservations" pulls its cast down into a sappy, cliche, retreaded, and
boring romance comedy that really manages to pay no respect to its
audiences intelligence.
|