|
This flick is
one I've heard about for around a year now. People were raving up and
down that this movie was sick and scary, but no one was giving anything
away (which is rare in today's society where people feel the need to
ruin each and every twist of every movie ever released). I had this
movie on my "to watch list," but when I started seeing hype about the
new movie "Quarantine" and learned that it was a remake of [REC], the
movie became an immediate must see. After watching it, I realized some
things.
First, I wish I could have seen this movie not knowing what was going to
happen (the trailer for "Quarantine" gives away each and every plot
twist of the movie, so no one is going to be surprised if they come into
this experience having seen that trailer first). I had my doubts after
the first twenty minutes or so that this movie would live up to its hype
because it's so genius at looking unassuming and normal, so that when
the shit hits the fan, you can truly be shocked by what happens. I mean,
I knew what was going to happen and I was STILL cringing and gasping
while I watched the film.
Second, even though there is a language barrier at work here (as the
original [REC] is in Spanish and the currently available versions come
with a set of rather dubious subtitles) good acting can make characters
imminently relatable. Manuela Velasco, who plays the reporter Angela
Vidal, is adorable, and her plight is frightening to watch. We see this
poor woman slowly unravel as she gets deeper and deeper into a horrible
situation with no foreseeable way out and the actress manages to be
terrified without being shrill or annoying, which is a tough act to pull
off. Everyone in the movie is totally engaged from start to finish, it
doesn't appear that anyone is slacking off or just cashing a paycheck;
the movie is full of believable performances from even minor characters,
which is something I greatly appreciated. Third, I saw once again how
limited special effects can be used to have a greater impact when
they're applied in the right way.
|
This movie doesn't have
fountains of blood, but when there is grue onscreen, it is
very effective. When chunks are bitten out of people's skin,
it's just shadowy enough to hide any imperfections in the
special effects budget without looking like a copout.
Whatever people want to say about director Jaume Balaguero
(and a lot of people have a lot of things to say, since his
last major flick was "Darkness," another picture that I
loved but everyone else hated) he knows how to set a scene
and stick with it and use atmosphere to make his situations
compelling. |
|
 |
The guy is a genius. I will watch
anything he produces. I worship the quicksand he walks on. I'm
walking a thin line here, not wanting to give away too much of the
plot (although like I said earlier, if you watch television and
you've seen even the TV spot for "Quarantine," you know way too much
already). I will say this, though...anyone who told you that this
was a zombie movie is wrong. Don't come in expecting reanimated
corpses. You will be disappointed. Basically, a television crew is
filming a reality TV show about firefighters, and they follow the
firefighters on an emergency call to an apartment building where
frightened neighbors complained that one of their elderly neighbors
has been in her apartment screaming all night. The firefighters and
some police who are on the scene go to check things out and they
find the woman wandering around in her apartment, apparently
delusional, and when they try to help her, she attacks them. Soon
the residents of the apartment are in a panic.
The police and disease control have
sealed off the exits to the apartment so the TV crew and the residents
are trapped inside with no idea what is going on as things become more
and more dangerous and it gets harder and harder to survive the
onslaught of paranoia and hysteria. If I have one small complaint about
this movie it is that the subtitles are a little hokey. I didn't
understand what they were saying sometimes since they were translated
badly, but other than that, this is a solid horror film with oppressive
atmosphere, great acting, great effects, and a final scene that will
creep you out long after the movie has ended.
So how does this most recent rehash hold
up? Well, I'm surprised to say that it holds up pretty well. I expected
it to be terrible, but it manages for most of its running time to be
almost a carbon copy of the original, and anything it adds to the plot
of the movie only helps the story along. Remakes are notorious for being
far worse than their predecessors, but this one holds up nicely.
Moving the action to Los Angeles, actress Jennifer Carpenter takes over
the role of reporter Angela Vidal. Carpenter is likable and for most of
the film that likeability manages to carry her performance. We see more
of the cameraman this time, and he is played compellingly by actor Steve
Harris (another likable TV star) who does well with what he's given for
this role. He's very reassuring and relatable in the way he tries to
keep everyone from freaking out even when the situation inside the
apartment building gets increasingly freaky. I admired his performance
in this movie. Everyone else gives a capable performance too, though
certain police and firemen who were much more likable in the original
movie transform into unbelievable told here, and I think that has a lot
to do with the message of the movie.
See, in [REC] the government is seen as pretty horrible, sealing these
poor people in the apartment with a frightening and deadly situation
going on, but in "Quarantine," the evil of the government rises
exponentially. First of all, in the few seconds before the city turns
off cable television and electricity for the apartment, we see a
television report where an elected official is claiming that everyone
has been evacuated from the apartment (talk about feeling screwed by the
government). Second, the few members of the Center for Disease Control
who do come in to examine the remaining apartment residents lie to
everyone about what is going on and what the tests will entail. Let's
just say the residents are lucky that all hell breaks loose before they
get a chance to test everyone. There's constantly a sense that the
government is trying to cover up what is happening to these people, and
the trapped reporters say more than once that they have to record the
events in order to record the truth of what happened. While the
reporters say this in the original [REC], the sense that the government
is lying is much more prevalent here, which reflects the US and our
current mistrust of the government.
While [REC] leaves the source of what is turning the residents of the
apartment into psychotic killers, "Quarantine" gives a much more mundane
solution , which mostly works for the running time of the movie until it
all falls apart at the end. Honestly, this isn't a bad movie, it just
pales in comparison to the original, so any criticism of the elements of
the movie is really just nitpicking, save for three things. First of
all, I love Jennifer Carpenter, but in this movie, she falls apart. I
know it's a scary situation, but remember, the actress in [REC] managed
to be terrified without being shrill. Carpenter fails miserably at this.
Her dialogue for the last twenty minutes of the movie consists of "WAAAAHHHH
AAAHHH NNNAAAHHH" and it becomes so annoying we want to kill her
ourselves. Poor Steve Harris is trying to save them both, and we feel
for him trying to keep her calm while she's screaming and shaking the
camera and pulling on him and basically doing everything she can to get
them both killed. Second, the shaky camerawork that was present in [REC]
is so much worse here that I almost threw up watching this movie. I'm
not kidding you, at times the screen is so dark and swirling with images
that it's going to make you feel hung-over when you leave the theater.
|
 |
|
The camerawork is noticeably
inferior in this version of the film (which was a big
complaint of mine with the movie Cloverfield, but those
characters were amateur cameramen, in this movie, the
cameraman is supposed to actually be a trained cameraman,
and his lack of skill gets annoying, even if he has to deal
with Whiny McScreamalot and film at the same time). The
third and final nail in the coffin for me is the conclusion
of the movie, and here I'm going to try and walk on
eggshells so as not to spoil anything. |
In [REC] the filmmakers craft an
intriguing explanation for what is happening that deals with newspaper
clippings and a tape recording found in one of the apartments. It all
leads to one of the freakiest scenes I've witnessed in a horror movie in
years, and it's seamlessly well done. Quarantine takes that same idea
and throws it out the window, opting instead for Jennifer Carpenter
screaming and whining while the camera swirls around some newspaper
clippings where we literally can read about three words ("lab" and
"chemical warfare"). So we're supposed to assume that chemical warfare
caused all this to happen? The government is evil again, right? And then
the characters find a tape recording all right, but the batteries on the
tape recorder are going dead, so all they hear is a bunch of garbled
sounds and no discernable words. So what the fuck was the purpose of
putting that tape recording in the movie if they weren't going to be
able to hear anything? These caveats make the final scenes of the movie
make way less sense than those in [REC] and they ruin what was a cool
and thought-provoking twist. Maybe the filmmakers think that scary
images make up for a lack of substance, but I'm offended by that. This
isn't the worst remake ever and it's not a bad little movie on its own,
but why would I watch a dumbed-down version of events when I could watch
the original and get much more of a cool story with my scary images?
"Quarantine" suffers from the "more is more" mentality of recent
Hollywood films. If you've never seen [REC] you probably won't be
bothered by the stupid things it does, but it irritated me because it
could have been so much more. First it has an ad campaign that gives
everything away, starting with the movie title. [REC] refers to the
flashing words at the bottom of the camera indicating that it is
recording, and it is a lovely little ambiguous title that leaves the
viewer wondering what the movie is about. Naming the movie "Quarantine"
is like naming "Rosemary's Baby" "Satan's Baby." It gives way too much
away too soon, let alone the ad campaign that gives away every twist of
the movie and a cop out explanation at the end of the movie that doesn't
explain anything. These problems don't detract from the cool scary
images that the movie has and the few things it adds that are actually
thought provoking and interesting, but in the end, it's just a useless
rehash that pales in comparison to the original. It could have been so
much more, but I can't reward potential, so I have to warn you that if
you want to see the story executed in a much better fashion, check out [REC]
and skip this sequel.
|