|
SAVE ME
|
||||||||||
|
It didn't suck. First of all, there are a collection of unknown actors on display here that will have you scratching your head saying things like "dude, I've seen him before" and "who the hell is she? She looks familiar..." The bonus is that while none of these people are really famous, they happen to be great little character actors who can breathe life into their roles and make it hard for you to believe that the characters aren't real. I always appreciate it when independent movies can do that. It's one of the perks of having a bigger budget to work with than most indies have, I suppose, but they put the money to good use here, so I have no complaints. Chad Allen isn't exactly unknown, but since I never watched "Dr. Quinn Medicine Woman" when I was younger, I only really knew him from a few interviews I'd read. I have to say though, he kicks ass here. He manages to look younger in the beginning of the movie, so there's no irritating distraction coming from having to watch 30 year olds act like teenagers. Allen's character is believably cynical and jaded enough that even when things threaten to sink into melodrama, his sarcastic and abrasive attitude helps keep the proceedings grounded. Later in the movie, when he starts to believe the message of redemption that people are trying to drill into his head, he handles things with enough of his remaining tough-guy attitude that the transformation doesn't seem forced, and that's enough to help this movie skate along smoothly when it could easily have become bogged down and preachy.
Robert Gant isn't given enough screen time here, but just when I was getting ready to bitch that his character isn't given a chance to develop, the filmmakers go and give him the two best scenes in the movie. His fight with Judith Light's character at the end is worth the price of the movie. Even the bit players like Arron Shiver and Robert Baker manage to inject genuine humanity into their small roles that help move the plot along steadily and compellingly. So what's so preachy about the subject matter here? Well, for starters, when we first meet Chad Allen's character Mark, he's strung out on drugs and alcohol, taking a guy to a motel for some sleazy sex intercut with images of a congregation in a church singing hymns. Very subtle guys. But I have to admit, the imagery is compelling, so it did impress me on a purely artistic level. Anyway, when Mark overdoses in this opening scene, his family is done with his antics, and they deposit him in a Christian rehab place and leave him there. The twist here is that this rehab place claims to help participants turn their lives around in more ways than one, they won't just stop using drugs and denying God, they'll stop being gay, too. That's right. Another gay movie. That's what I thought too, but like I said, this one was different. First of all, this movie doesn't just pay lip service to showing "both sides of the story," it backs that claim up with some good storytelling. The people who run the rehab center, while being misguided and a little obsessive, are actually providing a service to these men. At one point, Stephen Lang's character says "I don't know if our way is the only right way...but we do help," and he's got a point. They got Mark off the streets, got him off drugs, and gave him a way to turn his life around. Most movies like this wouldn't even come close to showing the "religious" characters as this sympathetic, but here, everyone is trying to do the right thing in their own flawed way, and that's a lot more compelling than preaching only one side of a story. We also feel for Judith Light's character. She lost her son to suicide years ago, so she's on a crusade to save these men, and she truly believes she's right. When she meets Mark, he reminds her so much of her son that she eventually becomes obsessed, and in the end, she still thinks she's right, but she is genuinely trying to do good, and she admits that she is flawed, too. It's rare that a movie like this would have the balls to end on the note that this one does, with us being able to see both points of view, even if we don't agree with one. That's difficult to do, and for that, I give this movie kudos.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Have something to say about this review? Pop on over to Cinema-Lunatics
and speak your mind in our Answer Back! Forums >> |
|
[
Link to
Us |
FAQ |
Top^
] ¤ ¤ ¤ |