|
The voice work
for “Space Chimps” isn’t the worst I’ve ever heard with Andy Samberg
really taking to his role as Ham III given some really funny lines and
interplay with Patrick Warburton who plays the uptight jock that he’s
perfected and made his own trademark. Hearing the voice work is what
made this an interesting experience.
I don’t know perhaps it’s cyclical, or maybe it’s just a subliminal
effort from Hollywood to convince kids that NASA is still a relevant
program worth spending our tax dollars on when we could be using it
for health care and education, but we’re now in the millennium and
the big fad is animals in space! “Space Chimps” is not an allegory,
it’s not symbolic of something, and hell it’s barely even a creative
name. It’s just a title that tells you the premise with zero effort
almost as if the intent from producers. It’s chimps in space,
they’re astronauts. If you want to know anything more then you’re
over estimating Vanguard. I really wanted to enjoy “Space Chimps”
mainly because the trailers were so funny, but if you’re not under
the age of ten and hopped up on sugar, you’re not going to enjoy
what Vanguard serves up to audiences. An uneasy mixture of pop
culture nods, spiritual undertones, and NASA propaganda, “Space
Chimps” moves at such a breakneck speed that it’s impossible to
really enjoy what’s going on.
|
The characters are so broad that
we never get the chance to like them because after the first
ten minutes we’re watching slacker chimp Ham III in NASA
training to be an astronaut. After only a few montages of
him training and not taking his work seriously, does he
finally go to space in a moment so abrupt I almost thought
the producers opted to cut footage. |
|
 |
If that’s not enough, an
obligatory plot involving aliens, a secret volcano on another
planet, and a plan to rule the galaxy is shoe horned in to the plot
and never actually finds a way to combine to feel like one singular
narrative. Instead we jump from one central plot that’s basically a
fable a la “Apollo 13,” while we jump on to another that’s almost
like a rejected idea for a Dr. Seuss movie.
Upon the villain’s
introduction, I wondered if they’d accidentally edited another film
in to “Space Chimps,” the editing is so shoddy. Before we can even
grasp the one note characters (there’s the chimp who takes his job
too seriously, the hero who doesn’t, the feminine foil to the
childish males, the experienced chimp) we’re launched in to endless
antics that are either hit or miss, and when they miss it’s a pretty
flat affair to sit through Even at only eighty minutes, “Space
Chimps” is tedious, and the writers seem to be working so hard
around this one note concept of Chimps in Space, that they struggle
to fit in actual story, and fail more often than not. It’s the
definition of mediocrity in a summer that gave us “Wall-E.”
I mean I’m not
saying every animated film this year should be compared to “Wall-E,” but
when we’re given such platitudes of romance, consumerism, and
environmental awareness, chimps in space fighting aliens is a real let
down. A real writer would have turned this in to a great animated action
flick instead of animated ADD pabulum.
|