|
The Wachowskis aspire for something unusual and awfully contradictory
with “Speed Racer.” They want an intentionally animated live action
film, but a film that also looks as realistic as possible. They want a
family film, but this is a film that may not be appealing to all
children, and they want a story that simple but also quite complicated.
Just when you think you’ve seen all of Spritle and his monkey, there’s
an unusual tale about corporate corruption. Maybe it’s because of all
the contradictions and hapless surrealism that I responded to “Speed
Racer” with such enthusiasm. I know it won’t be for everyone, but
speaking as someone willing to meet the Wachowskis halfway, everything
involving Speed and Racer X made for some interesting drama. Not only do
Matthew Fox and Emile Hirsch ace the chemistry as brothers, but the
casting is competent. You have to appreciate the Wachowskis taking an
awful franchise with a wholly uninteresting character turning it into a
cheesy but fun pulp flick.
|
Even if its sole intent is to
appeal to children, the smell of pulp was so thick I found
their effort quite endearing, and this is speaking as
someone who never liked Speed Racer. I’ve suffered through
many versions, given it many chances, and I’ve never been
able to enjoy this series. But “Speed Racer” works on a
level that wobbles back and forth from family entertainment
to exclusive pulp cult classic. |
|
 |
I may be proven wrong years from now, but
I’m willing to watch this again and give it a fair shot.
Some of the racing
scenes are so chaotic and wonky that my head was spinning, but at the
same time I sat on edge rooting for Speed and wondering if Racer X would
admit he was Rex. One of the staples of the franchise is the obvious
twist in Racer X, and the Wachowskis accomplish that tension with the
help of Fox’s strong performance. There’s also the great performance
from Goodman who is perfect as Pops, and Ricci adds her own brand of
charisma to Trixie. Hirsch adds a sense of humility and Skywalker-esque
courage that makes him a great choice for Speed. The Wachowskis want to
strive for a movie beyond simple family fare, and they succeed. Some of
the scenes are bafflingly weird, but at the same time, quite exciting.
It’s not perfect, but it’s entertaining enough to warrant a pleased
smile from moi.
The first few minutes of “Speed Racer” are pretty much an indicator of
what’s to come and who this is aimed toward. Speed sits on a bench
preparing for a race and is bobbing his leg rapidly, which then
immediately cuts to a young Speed (we need to see him as a kid,
apparently), who is also bobbing his leg very quickly. ADD addled
children, this movie is for you, says the subtle imagery. And boy howdy,
is that ever correct. For many the imagery here will prove to be quite
mind boggling and the Wachowski’s aim to flash the moving
character/still imagery element to their film, and do it until it’s
absolutely jarring. As for the narrative, it’s simply everywhere with
incessant flashback after flashback, sub-plots that meander back and
forth from our villain, to Racer X, to Speed, to Pops, and so on and so
forth, to the point where not even the Wachowski’s are sure who the main
character in this action tale is.
As for Paulie Litt, I’m sure he tried his hardest in this role, but
Spritle and Chim Chim are without a doubt two of the most obnoxious film
characters I’ve seen since Jar Jar Binks. Not only do the Wachowskis
spend too much time on them, assuming this would qualify as an appeal to
a young audience, but most of their riffs are inane and blank white
noise without a single purpose to add to the story. Had the film been
cut by twenty minutes, including the material with the Spritle and his
chimp, “Speed Racer” would have excelled. The characters are often
grating, and I often wondered if we were really supposed to see a movie
about Spritle. I thought Speed was the main character here, but what do
I know? I didn’t figure in spending two hours watching a kid and a
monkey get into hijinks while the directors piss on “Freedbird” in one
instance. You just don’t mess with “Freedbird.”
The Wachowskis
attempt an adult’s kids movie, and don’t always succeed. With a mixture
of kitschy surrealism, over the top visuals, and an obscene running
time, I don’t know who this movie is for, but it’s not for adults, and
it certainly won’t appeal too much to kids. All I know is that I didn’t
hate it, and that was enough for me.
|