|
I loved the original "Stir of Echoes" so I was disheartened to see a
direct-to-video sequel on the shelves of my local video store, but after
hearing good things about it I decided to check it out and I was
pleasantly surprised. First of all, this movie has nothing to do with
the original "Stir of Echoes" except that the lead character is a father
who sees ghosts lurking around him and his family. Second, this movie
adds a political element by making the
lead character a soldier who is injured in the war and centering the
events of the movie around a debate over whether killing on the battle
field is comparable to everyday killing on US soil. The opening twenty
minutes of this movie are compelling. We care about Rob Lowe's character
and the decisions he has to make as a soldier. He doesn't want to have
to kill anyone, least of all innocent people, and the choices a soldier
makes are often very difficult to understand for the soldier, let alone
friends and family at home. That's not to excuse hasty actions or tragic
deaths perpetrated by soldiers, it's simply a statement that it's very
easy to judge what people do "over there" in war when we're over here
and not fighting for our lives every day, unsure whether a civilian in
need of help is REALLY a civilian in need of help or a suicide bomber
with bombs strapped to himself ready to blow us to smithereens if we try
to help him. I say all this because the lead character in this movie
fucks up badly and makes a decision that costs people their lives and
puts him in a coma.
|
When he awakens his best friend and fellow soldier is dead,
and he's sent home to a strained family life where his wife
and son have drifted away from him and his efforts to
reconnect are rather harsh and commanding and thus result in
more distance put between he and his family. He starts
seeing visions of dead people and since he's been told this
is part of his post traumatic stress disorder, he seeks help
and finds that hospitals are unwilling to help him without
insurance. |
|
 |
It's a sad situation and very recognizable for many people in this
country who try to survive without health insurance, and his condition
makes it more reasonable to see why he doesn't immediately see that
something is wrong when he starts seeing dead people. Soon things begin
to become "clear" through a stupid plot contrivance that I'll discuss in
more detail below, and the poor guy realizes that he needs to do
something to figure out what is going on and who the strange burned
figure is that he keeps seeing in his visions. The mystery is cool if
not totally unpredictable, and the conclusion is wrenching and left me
yelling at the screen. Suffice it to say that whatever side you fall on
with the debate over whether war is ever justified, you'll have
something to be angry about. It really bothered me that people were so
willing to dismiss this guy and call him a killer and compare his
actions to those of someone in this country, not in a battle situation,
who killed an innocent person in cold blood because he was angry. Even
if killing is wrong no matter who does it, then the most important part
of that sentence is that KILLING IS WRONG. I was furious with some of
the characters in this movie who were willing to cover up a murder
simply to protect a friend. That's not good for anyone involved, whether
there are vengeful ghosts in the picture or not! I must say that I
didn't expect this movie to engage me in a moral debate with myself, and
I appreciate and respect it for doing just that.
That being said... is it just me or is Rob Lowe a really bad actor? His
overacting in this movie made me flinch more than once and detracted
from the movie. Not only that, but the explanation for why this guy sees
dead people is exceedingly stupid and not really an explanation. The
movie would have been better off without the histrionics, if the
filmmakers left it unexplained why the guy could see ghosts. It would be
easy enough to draw the conclusion as
to why he could see the particular ghosts he sees in this movie without
going into a hokey set piece with a blind soldier and a bunch of
mumbo-jumbo about how the supernatural events came about. I'm annoyed
and I advise you to fast forward through this entire sequence. You won't
miss anything and the movie really is stronger without all the bullshit.
An in-name-only sequel that actually manages to be not only watchable
but entertaining, if you ignore the caveats mentioned above.
|