|
The second leg of Romero's zombie epic takes a page from
"Day of the Dead" in where our characters seek refuge in an island out
on the water and are continuing an ever going debate on whether or not
the walking dead can be adjusted to eat an alternative to long pig. Once
again Romero splits audiences down the middle with "Survival of the
Dead," a definitely polarizing zombie entry from the master who
continues to entertain me in spite of audiences continued
misunderstanding of what the king of the zombies is pushing for.
Branching off from his underrated "Diary," Romero centers in on
protagonist Crocket (Alan Van Spring who I know for all the wrong
reasons*). You may remember him as the military crony who stole supplies
from the film students in "Diary" from their trailer by threat of death.
Now here he's a misunderstood protagonist, a victim just like everyone
who has been driven insane by the sheer abundance of lives taken by the
clutches of this unforeseen infection. What with our perceptions of the
world twisted with "Diary" showing the military now an utterly
untrustworthy entity, Crocket and his small band of soldiers now must
seek the trust in the civilians they pilfered from when they look for an
island out in the sea. "Survival" has its own relevance and message with
its depiction of a somewhat vague pro-life/pro-choice debate that ranges
between two warring families on this island.
|
Like what we've seen today, each side can not
stop arguing about the small things enough to focus on their
own happiness, and Crocket and his crew watch as the world
sinks ever deeper in this salvation where even the smaller
families with the potential to offer peace refuse to lay
down their arms and work together to restore order in this
new world. They have the resources and know how to keep the
dead at bay, but like we saw in "Night," they're too wrapped
up in their territory and pride to actually work side by
side and keep their land pure and healthy. |
|
 |
The dead litter the
grass and religious matriarch Muldoon (like all pro-lifers) wants to
restore their own view of life while never afraid to take actual
human life in the process of getting his message across. Meanwhile
O'Flynn is more based around atheistic and pro-choice beliefs where
he thinks cutting down the dead has nothing to do with religion at
all but more about personal welfare and consideration to our own
well being. That is all pushed aside because who is right and who is
wrong becomes irrelevant when the dead begin to gain leverage on the
families and prove once and for all that they've become the dominant
race. Continuing to push his rather entertaining dark comedy in the
process, Romero is still capable of bringing us sharp and bleak
horror films with a view of this small island who claim to be better
than the world outside the water but are just in the same muck and
grime as everyone else in the cities and metropolitan areas. Van
Spring gives a very good performance here as this man simply
observing from a distance like the kids in "Diary" behind their
cameras. Like everyone here, he's trying to figure out where to lay
his loyalties and once he gains a full perspective of the lunacy
taking place in even the most level headed of characters introducing
himself, he realizes that perhaps if he lets them take each other
out, he can possibly build his own salvation free of this endless
debating. Which is left ambiguous when his young partner (played by
Devin Bostick) offers up the only logical conclusion: that perhaps
someday they'll be at war for completely new reasons. When you
witness the final scene, it doesn't seem like a far gone conclusion.
Sadly, Romero breaks his own rules to offer up some
camp value by showing moaning and groaning heads of the dead when he
explicitly states constantly in his previous pictures that the dead
will be brought down when their heads have been separated from their
bodies. Meanwhile, I never sympathized a bit for the character
Fransisco since he becomes such a blatant plot device by the second
half of the story. Turning in to a zombie with enough convenience
for the plot to roll along he sets in to motion Tomboy's inevitable
kidnapping which ultimately brings forward the climax. Altogether
it's a rather cheap dive from Romero to move forward the climax
instead of allowing for natural plot progression and cheapens the
ultimate believability of the character's actions.
Is Romero out of touch with the world or is the world out
of touch with Romero? I guess we'll never find out, but I'm prone to
believe the latter. "Survival of the Dead" will not change the genre
like "Night" and "Dawn" did, nor is it at all perfect, but it has its
own relevance and message like its previous entries and I enjoyed it all
to hell. Romero still stands tall among ants; long live Romero.

-
*I know of Van
Spring and co-star Athena Karkanis from my favorite guilty pleasure
"The Best Years." Sue me.
|