|
Did we need this? No. Did we need to see this? No. Were we forgetting? I
could live to be 99, and I’ll still remember it. So, why was it made?
That’s up for debate. But it happened, and there was nothing left to do
but watch it and hope for the best; Greengrasses depiction of the
September 11th and the incident and eventual crash on United
93 is surely a tense and deft exploration that never really seeks to be
fantastic or grandiose. I can tell you we didn’t need this, but does
that devalue it? No way. I admit to you, I was prepared to tear this to
shreds, and I was readying myself to loathe this. But a strange thing
occurred.
During this film, I had a lump in my throat and my chest was tight from
the tension. And then suddenly I was back in September 11th,
and the memories flooded back, and if you’ve had a more personal
experience with that tragedy, I warn you that you will not be able to
sit through most of it, simply because the realism is so aggressive that
I just was uneasy and horrified. If you can sit through the last fifteen
minutes without crying or looking away, well then, you’re a better
person than I. The sense of impending doom is palpable from the opening
sequence in which we view many of the eventual passengers for the flight
that will soon meet their fates; the script never really seems to
attempt melodrama, or obligatory sub-plots. No passengers fall in love,
and no one is really recognizable.
They talk about their flights, their food, ask for stewardesses, and
basically talk about what they’re going to do when they get home; most
effective is that their dialogue is never overly audible and is usually
very scattered and lost within the background while the command center
watches as the plans are being hijacked. Greengrass, a usually
experimental director, never goes hammy or showy in terms of camera
angles and story pacing. Greengrass strives for stark simplicity and a
barely audible score. “United 93” further becomes frantic and incredibly
taut as we witness the trepidation by the terrorists before their
hijacking, and in one of the more gripping moments an audio engineer’s
discover of the full scope of the terrorists’ plans, while the officials
scramble attempting to devise a plan.
Thankfully, Greengrass doesn’t enlist CGI to show the planes crashing,
yet he only shows a blurry news feed of the crashes that hits home more
than any sophisticated computer generated graphics can ever hope to, and
then we’re brought onto United 93 for the remainder of the film where
they finally decide that they must get to the cockpit—because they’re
not landing anywhere, and they’re not going home. Here’s hoping this
never happens again.
Whether or not “United 93” will ever have a long shelf life just remains
to be seen, because Greengrass, possibly due to fear, never thinks
outside the box, and grounds his film into its own conventions of safety
and PC. “United 93” ends up becoming about as poetic and subversive as
Civil War re-enactments never going outside of its scenario and just
choosing to depict what was recorded. It’s simply not artistic, but just
a recreation, and it never asks why, nor does it ever really challenge
its audience. It just gives us this situation and expects us to watch.
And the script is just all too predictable for the audience to really
take seriously. Greengrass relies too much on forced foreshadowing and
insists on bringing down our guards while the danger looms. Everyone
says “Beautiful day for flying”, or “Not a cloud in the sky”, or “It’s
going to be a great day!” We get it, already. The attempted irony and
symbolism is lame, and “United 93” is focused on gauging our emotions
and nothing more.
If you want to
know about what happened on September 11th, look no further
than the documentary “9/11”, where you’ll find an honest and blunt
recounting about that day. But for pure morbid curiosity and to have
more of the obvious stated to you, “United 93” is a flawed, but gripping
well-crafted piece of drama that's more than worth a watch. And you may
want to have something to cheer you up afterwards.

- The actual
receptionist and officials from that day were cast in the film for
realism.
- There is also an
alternate version of the film which was created by the cable channel
A&E called "Flight 93" which aired earlier before this theatrical
version.
- Originally named
"Flight 93".
|