|
To his
credit, Armstrong's direction is rather sharp and sleek. He explains in
the opening through text that the film is set down in a dystopian
wasteland and for what the budget entails it's a pretty convincing
little science fiction setting with these women battling in wooded areas
and wastelands while presenting this landscape in shades of gray and
dark blue that keeps it feeling very grim and grimy. Armstrong is a
competent director who pulls off this setting with zeal and it is
convincing most of the time.
Ultimately I respect director Armstrong's production and ambition
for trying something new with its short format and wanting to tell a
story that's more epic than its budget would allow. "War is a Bitch"
is a movie with potential and with a better budget, it can rise to
be something of a look at humanity and female combatants. However as
it stands as a short film it's really just a war film that takes
pages from "Bladerunner." And as I sat I couldn't help but wonder
what the whole intent of the film was. Is it another trite take on
the ugliness of humanity? Is it just a look at the horror of war?
More importantly, is it just yet another heavy handed metaphor for
homosexuality? Armstrong definitely seems to want to go all over the
place with a moral that just drops on to all forms of social
commentary where our heroine Hope is caught in a war with a troop of
female soldiers who are in the middle of a battle involving a
dictatorial regime that bred Clones that they now must hunt. The big
brother organization bred these clones for reasons not fully
explained and it's their mission to find the clones and kill them.
But then Armstrong integrates a series of convenient plot twists and
deus ex machinas that just make no sense in the end.
|
For example Hope is ambushed by
her clone, is hung, her clone assumes her identity, Hope is
presumed dead, but we later learn that Hope is just a clone
whose memory was conveniently erased while in the scuffle
with the original Hope, thus she had no recollection of
being a clone at all. So... why did she realize she had a
massive bomb with her in the finale? Did the "father" of the
regime give it to her? |
|
 |
Did she put it on herself? Are the
clones assigned to self-destruct? And why didn't she notice she had
a massive bomb strapped to her stomach in the first place? And what
was with the plot involving Hope and her commanding officer? Was she
a lesbian? If so why did she call her commanding officer "mother"?
In either case, "War is a Bitch" is rife with possibilities that it
never can live up to, in the end. The characters are under developed
as hard as Armstrong tries to add exposition in the short time; for
example there's a female character donning white face paint, ruby
red lips, and dark black eyeliner. So... is she a cyborg, or a goth?
Meanwhile, the acting is hammy all across the board. The women all
play the parts to the best of their ability, but the dialogue is so
stilted they can never seem to believe what they're spewing. The
final monologue from Bern Cohen is rather hokey with his play as a
supreme ruler something of a cliche instead of adding an extra touch
of menace. As expressed "War is a Bitch" feels like a mini-budget
movie anxious to break out and become a massive science fiction
epic, and never quite rises above sub-par, in the end.
Ronald K. Armstrong is a competent director with a clear vision of this
futuristic world and he really does blow me away in the visual
department, but "War is a Bitch" fails in being a coherent and focused
story. With muddled exposition, broad characterization, a convoluted
final surprise twist, and unfocused social commentary, it's in need of a
redo and just ends as a sub-par science fiction short, however ambitious
it may be.
|