RAGING AT BATMAN
WEEK ONE: THE RETURN
Momar Van Der Camp

 

The return of Raging at Batman coincides with the Return of Bruce Wayne. Clever idea, right? It only took a year, but he’s back everybody, and he’s following in the footsteps of someone else. Namely, Steve Rogers. Hmm. This is going to be a touchy subject for a lot of people. But that’s the point of Raging. Unpopular subjects. On a now-weekly basis (hopefully). So we’ll start with some setup. Batman was “killed” by Zeta Beams from a gun by Darkseid. Let that set in. It originally looked like he died in a helicopter crash during Batman RIP and then getting shot in the stomach. But in true bullshit fashion, the creators of Batman RIP had Batman die in ANOTHER BOOK. Not in the book titled Batman RIP. But in a book called Final Crisis.
 

Fine, whatever. Score one point for Marvel for having Captain America “die” in his own book. And then stay “dead” for 2+ years. DC couldn’t stay away from the Bat-well for a year, let alone an ISSUE, before they hinted at the return of Bruce Wayne. It’s right there in the end of the last issue of Final Crisis, he’s at the beginning of time, drawing on cave walls.

I’ve touched on this subject before, but I wanted to bring it up again because of how stupid it is. So essentially, Captain America and Bat-Wayne (he’ll have to be coded as this, just like Bucky-Cap has to be coded as such now) both follow the same path but in different directions. Wayne goes back to the beginning of time and flows through times that he’s never been a part of, Cap goes back in time and relives his own life.

Okay, fine. Coincidence in the stories, whatever. But here’s where the coincidence “ends” and strangeness begins.

Bruce Wayne comes back and reveals that he’s been bankrolling Batman since the beginning. Bat-Dick is staying Batman and Bat-Wayne is becoming a new Batman. Okay, that doesn’t remind anyone of Captain America?

Bruce Wayne is bankrolling Batman. And has been ever since the beginning. That doesn’t sound like Tony Stark admitting that he wasn’t Iron Man but Iron Man was a staff member of Stark Industries/Enterprises who has been his personal bodyguard forever? Hmm. Okay, let’s look at something else.

Bat-Wayne is going to go country to country, continent to continent, and create Batman Inc. I absolutely hate this idea so much it hurts.

Batman works because there is one of him. Period. End of sentence. Sure, creating a network of Batmen lends credence to the whole idea of Batman as a myth, a dark entity that strikes fear into the hearts of criminals. But in the end: everyone knows Batman is real. BRUCE WAYNE JUST ANNOUNCED IT ON GODDAMN TELEVISION.

So there you have it. Him as a shadowy figure, hinted at, whispered about, and shrouded in secrecy is now torn away from the character. One of his best aspects that most fans loved holding onto is now gone. Stripped to the core to reveal a new corporate Batman and Grant Morrison says that this was his plan all along. Just like his plan was being late with the issues and giving us a wrap up that was both stupid and completely worthless and unnecessary. If DC had any balls, Bruce Wayne would have stayed dead. If Marvel had balls, Steve Rogers would have stayed dead.

But they are cash cows. Just like Peter Parker will never die and stay dead, none of the major characters will. We all know this, it’s an unwritten rule of comic books.

Everyone knows that people who die in comics don’t stay dead. Except Uncle Ben and Gwen Stacy. I defy you to honestly find someone else. But either way. Giving the world a corporate Batman and get us a Japanese Batman and a British Batman and a Irish Batman and a French Batman is stupid. Just plain stupid, with a capital S. It’d be like making the last son of Krypton have a cousin and a dog and a clone and a whole bottle city…oh wait. Bad example. It’d be like having Spider-man give up his marriage to Mary Jane by dealing with the devil…oh wait. Another bad example.

It’d be like…you know what, it’s not worth it. There are a million bad examples here. It’s comics. That’s what they do. But we love them anyway because next month they might get better. But here we are: how can a French Batman ever be a good idea? I mean, honestly? Batman fighting crime under the Eiffel Tower? Eff that crap.

Batman works best as a character in shadow. And bringing him into the public eye after forcing the readers to read awful stories about his comeback is just insult to injury. So here we are, a year or so later, and Bruce Wayne is back.

And all I care about is when the hell can I see a pure version of Batman again: like the Arkham Asylum video game sequel or the Dark Knight sequel.

 

Reproduction and reprinting should only occur with express written permission
and proper credit to Cinema Crazed and its authors.
 

Have something to say about this article? Pop on over to Cinema-Lunatics
and speak your mind in our
Answer Back! Forums >>

 


[   Digg!   |   Link to Us   |   FAQ   |   Top^   |   AddThis Social Bookmark Button   ]

All written reviews material and content are a copyright of Felix Vasquez Jr. and Cinema Crazed.
Content borrowed without written permission will not be permitted.

¤ ¤ ¤