|
THE STEPFORD WIVES
(2004)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Call me sexist, but why are men depicted as ogres here, and the women as
victims, when in actuality, the women are haggard shrews and the men are
just trying to catch up. Because we're supposed to feel sorry for and
root for Kidman's character, a haggard shrew who loves to exploit men
for her own career and when she harkens upon this society, she discovers
they're doing something to women, and in the climax she wins again.
There, I saved you ninety minutes. You should be thanking me. Oh, and
there are two gay characters added for no other reason than a "Will &
Grace" twist, and for a feign attempt at comedic effect. So, either way,
there's no surprise in the fact that this dreck was troubled
production-wise before it stumbled in to theaters, because this is just
a mess of a movie wasting its talents of Nicole The film is very rushed starting with the basic broad introduction and emphasis of Kidman's character, then she's fired in a ridiculous and awful sequence involving facial expressions, and Broderick's character gets a job at Stepford and they move there obviously noticing something isn't right with the women there. What emerges is what the women here consider ghastly, but isn't played for the right effect. Instead of watching these lobotomized women forced in to submission and thinking "My god, that's morbid", instead director Frank Oz plays it more for "Oh, isn't that funny?" with a twist of homosexuality. We watch the women "exercise" and serve their husband's every beckon call, but nothing is ever played for morbid and ends up becoming really stupid.
Within the pointless "satire" and attempts at comedy, it's more sad to
watch these talented actors stuck in to this garbage than to watch them
try and make sense out of story. Within all the "commentary" and
spoofing, instead of remaining true to the material, it just ends up
becoming insanely senseless. Is Nicole Kidman trying to test her appeal
by starring in Essentially this has a double purpose, it presents us with a bash of these womanly drones, makes it look appealing and then we feel guilty that it's actually kind of hot to imagine an army of hot subservient women. I mean seriously, is it so horrible to imagine hot subservient women? I ask you. Call me a caveman, but fuck you, these women were hot. And of course, the ending just has to be changed so the women win in the end, all to keep the writers out of the doghouse with a truly morbid ending, yet instead goes for the safe climax where men lose out. God forbid there be an ounce of originality. And there is, of course, the biggest blatant gaping plot hole I've ever come across in a movie, ever. If they're implanting chips in to the women to make them submissive, why does Broderick's character discover a robot that looks like his wife? Which is it, chips or robots? Which is it, mind controlled drones, or robotic doubles? Pick one! If it's robots, how do they get rid of the wives? Do they murder them? Put them in a state of comatose? Hide their bodies? If it's chips, how do they surgically implant them? Why are there no scars, or wounds? Why were there no scars in Kidman's character? How did she pretend to be a drone when she had the procedure done to her in front of the men? Who the fuck knows? I don't think even the writers know. So, I'll just say this sucks horribly, and skip it.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| What did you think? Discuss this film at the Cinema Crazed Forum |
|
[
Shop Movie Posters |
Link to
Us | FAQ |
Top^
] |