|
Well, this is a tennis romance drama and that's what the marketing
depended on. That, and Kirsten Dunsts' charm, but the real power is in
its star. Paul Bettany, what more is there to say? This guy can act with
the best of them, and has done wonders as an underrated character actor
who deserves this lead character status. I'm still waiting for his
star status to be granted. Bettany commands the screen and is utterly
scene stealing as Peter a truly likable character who we can sympathize
with. The writer really lets us get in to his character with his
entertaining introversion during his games, and his determination not to
let himself get psyched out by his other opponents. Bettany becomes very
believable as a seasoned pro tennis player and eventually we're brought
along with him to the tense and very exciting climax in which he must
prove to himself he's still a good player. The choreography is great and
the directing is sharp courtesy of Loncraine who gives us a light and
very airy romance that makes it easy on the eyes. As for John Favreau
who has a too short walk on role is funny as Peter's snarky quirky
agent.
It's so easy to pick apart the mainstream crap, simply because the flaws
are so in your face that it's like shooting fish in a barrel, especially
for a film I had high hopes for. Yes, despite the trailer, I had high
hopes, but about ten minutes in to the movie, I groaned and thought "Ah,
damn, it's just another romantic comedy", except the comedy part is
less subtle. But if you want to get technical, it's not much of a
romance either. I like Paul Bettany, I like Kirsten Dunst, and Sam Neill
is great, despite his gross under-usage, but a good film, this ain't.
"Wimbledon" tries desperately not to become yet another cookie cutter
romance film, but it is, it really is, and it's sad how it tries not to
be from beginning to end.
Whether it's the introversion with the main character or the sub-plots,
this is just another cookie cutter romantic comedy.
What keeps me from bashing it
relentlessly is just how well it's directed. Regardless, this paint by
numbers film is just predictable and cliché. Even the two main
characters' introductions are cliché, and wildly predictable, with
Bettany being the rather stuffy British tennis player Peter meeting the
sassy change of pace free-spirited American Lizzie in a rather
outrageous misunderstanding that gives us an idea of both their
personalities, and then the fireworks go off between them... for no
apparent reason. We never get even a logical reason or explanation as to
their attraction to one another, and they never have a real connection
other than tennis which doesn't really prove to be a powerful enough
connection. Peter and Lizzie also have zero chemistry with one another;
considering that Dunst gives a subdued and boring performance never able
to hold her own against Bettany, the two characters are oddly mismatched
and boring.
Their romance is sleepy from
beginning to end with the cliché obstacles like the resistant father who
wants the best for her daughter and doesn't want a man to interfere, to
another love interest it's all here for the picking and it was so
uninspired to watch. The scenes with Lizzie and Peter together
attempting to create sparks are boring and often times very forgettable
as not a single spark or believable bit of line ever comes out of their
many scenes with each other. And then there is the bane of the romantic
comedies, the musical montage, and we get it here, too. I can take
solace in the fact that the montage is short, but damn is it still ever
so obnoxious. The fact remains is we never believe in anything going on
with these characters, and we never care to, and seriously, was anyone
really surprised by the end?
Paul Bettany is underrated yet again going almost unnoticed amidst
Dunst's attempts to outshine him, but as hard as it tries, it's
ultimately a disappointment becoming yet another cookie cutter romantic
comedy.
|