{"id":25360,"date":"2017-05-25T21:07:06","date_gmt":"2017-05-26T01:07:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cinema-crazed.com\/blog\/?p=25360"},"modified":"2017-05-25T21:07:06","modified_gmt":"2017-05-26T01:07:06","slug":"the-wwe-book-of-top-10s-paperback","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cinema-crazed.com\/blog\/2017\/05\/25\/the-wwe-book-of-top-10s-paperback\/","title":{"rendered":"The WWE Book of Top 10\u2019s [Paperback]"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>As a list junkie and an old school fan of WWE, \u201cThe WWE Book of Top 10\u2019s\u201d is a great new compilation for fans of the sport that tackles all areas of the WWE for fans to debate about. Of course with all lists and books about lists, there is bound to be some anger and or controversy, but first and foremost DK publishing\u2019s \u201cThe WWE Book of Top 10\u2019s\u201d is a book meant for fun and intended to evoke conversation among wrestling buffs that can appreciate the novelty of this kind of guide.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Among some of the more interesting lists, there is stuff like \u201cThe Top 10 Signature Moves\u201d with iconic finishers like The Tombstone included. There\u2019s also some baffling and or inexplicable lists that seem included for filler. Like \u201cThe Top 10 Superstars of the 80\u2019s.\u201d Like\u2026 what is the criteria, and how can we measure that kind of status, exactly? Everyone has their own opinions and ideas about the best eighties superstars from the WWE. I\u2019m also not sure what \u201cTop 10 Dominant Champions\u201d means, either. Dominant as in big? Dominant as in aggressive? Dominant as in muscle bound? What\u2019s the criteria there? And \u201cTop 10 Non-Title Matches\u201d? That\u2019s a weird one. And \u201cTop Ten Rising Superstars\u201d will be a very important list\u2026 for two minutes.<\/p>\n

I think by January 2018, it\u2019ll a funny, odd, or tragic look at people who either arose high to fame, or dropped faster than broken elevator. Along with the more opinion leaning lists, there are also some factual lists included like \u201cTop 10 Longest Championship Reigns\u201d and \u201cTop 10 Shortest Championship Reigns.\u201d All in all, WWE unleashes another really interesting guide for fans old and new. It\u2019s two hundred pages filled with full color photos and dynamic action shots, and as with most DK Publishing paperbacks, it\u2019s sturdy enough to carry around without it falling to pieces. \u201cThe WWE Book of Top 10\u2019s\u201d was a lot of fun to sift through and should be a fine addition to wrestling collections.<\/p>\n