post

The Sound of a Flower (2015) [New York Asian Film Festival 2016]

soundofaflowerDuring the Joseon Dynasty in South Korea, Pansori opera was only sung by men as women were forbidden by law to sing.  It was believed that a woman’s body was too weak to sing.  Against those odds, Chae-Sun decides she wants to become a Pansori singer, going as far as dressing as a man to be allowed to sing.  With much reticence, Pansori Master Shin Jae-hyo takes her under his tutelage and makes a great singer of her.  When it’s found that the young man is in fact a woman, the master is imprisoned and the student makes a deal with the ruling Father-King Heung Seon Daewongun to save him.

The Sound of a Flower was written by almost a half a dozen people and still feels cohesive which means this is a great team and the director brought all of their work together with talent.  Director Jong-pil Lee co-wrote the film with Ah-Young Kim, Jae-eun Jeong, Hye-rim Park, and Mi-na Chung.  This team created a beautiful period piece and historical fiction where the history of Pansori opera and its first female singer is explored in a way that flows well and includes classic songs that most people outside of its country of origin have probably never heard. As the singing is very important in this film, the casting of a singer for the lead is not stunt casting as it often is but necessary.

In the part of Chae-Sun, the first female Pansori singer, is Bae Su-zy a member of the KPop group Miss A.  Here she takes the part of Chae-Sun and disappears into it, becoming this other person, this sweet and timid, yet determined woman who takes on incredible odds to achieve a dream even the law forbade.  From the get go, she gets the viewers to root for her and just keeps impressing them throughout the film, her subdued moments are contrasted by moment of pure courage and boldness and her performance shows great nuances and that she knows how to bring the right levels of emotions to each scene which makes her performance absolutely shine.

Playing opposite Bae Su-zy are Seung-ryong Ryu as the Pansori Master Shin Jae-hyo and Nam-gil Kim as Prince Daewon the King’s father.  Shin Jae-hyo shows a calm determination for most of the film as well as a lot of care for Chae-Sun.  His performance is subtle and strong, with emotions clearly held back most of the time, showing so much even in silent scenes.  The man’s expressions talk for him many times, his eyes say so much.  His emotions at times come through so well, they will break viewers’ hearts.  Nam-gil Kim plays devilish with a passion, abandon even at times.  His performance is less subtle and more extravagant with is entirely called for here with his more flamboyant character.

The attention to details in The Sound of a Flower is incredible.  The costumes by Yoo-jin Kwon and Seung-hee Rim are beautiful and so well made.  The production design by Jong-gun Lee looks stunning.  These are showcased by cinematography by Hyun Seok Kim in scenes and sequences that linger on just the right things for just the right time.  The balance in colors, brights, and darks is well thought out and gives room for the other visual aspects to shine.  Of course, in a film about opera, the music is of high importance.  Here the music by Tae Song Kim is subtle and adds perfectly to the classic Pansori songs and numbers.

The Sound of a Flower is a beautiful movie, well cast, well acted in stunning settings, with high quality costumes.  Fans of historical dramas will love this musical and most viewers should learn a few things about Pansori opera.  In all of this, it’s also a tragic love story based on historical facts that tugs at the heart.

post

Zinnia Flower (2015) [New York Asian Film Festival 2016]

ZinniaFlowerDirector Tom Lin made the Taiwanese “Zinnia Flower” following the death of his wife in 2012 as part of his grieving process.  The film follows Ming who lost her fiancé and Wei who lost his wife and unborn child both in a major car accident.  Their loves ones get Buddhist funerals in which the departed’s loves ones come to the temple every 7 days for 49 days and are supposed to let go at the end of the grieving period of 100 days.  Ming and Wei’s paths cross a few times during this process but each goes through their grief their own way.

The film is co-written by its director Tom Lin and writer Wei-Jan Liu.  They craft a highly personal film about grieving, letting go, moving on, and remembering.  Lin puts all of his feelings and hope in this film which is filled with sadness and love.  The two mourners the story follows are complex and layered characters, each showing two very different ways of grieving with the victims’ families each taking different approaches to how to include them in the funeral process.  The film explores many angles to grief, none of them being better or worse than the other.  It also never judges or becomes schmaltzy; it’s a good study in its subject.  The director’s closeness to the subject, the fact that he has clearly battled with this, shows throughout the film.  He works with a hard subject delicately and gets his audience to share in the worse experience (most likely worse) of his life.

With a subject so close to his heart, the casting of the characters he created is so important.  The actors needed to be perfect for their parts.  In the part of Ming, the young woman who lost her fiancé in the accident, Karena Lam offers a subdued performance that hits all the right notes.  One of her scenes in particular should have every eye watching tearing up.  Her character goes through the grieving process without much support but how she decides to go through it on her own shows strength and courage.  She not only shows that her character is sad and mad, but you can also see the moment when she takes her life in her own hands, the moment her sadness changes , all of this through the actress’ soft, yet strong performance.  In the part of Wei, actor Shih Chintlang, a guitarist from the band Mayday, portrays a man in the worse possible period of his life, having lost both his wife and unborn child.

His performance embodies grief in a more classical way, with anger and the other steps up until acceptance.  His feelings are more expressed than Ming’s, thus the actor’s performance bounces back and forth between stronger feelings.  He makes the viewers feel with him in a more visceral way. For those who do not know much about Buddhism and its funeral ceremonies, the way grieving is handled is very interesting.  Over 49 days, the mourner goes to the temple to remember the dead and grieve.  After 49 days, there is also an important point at day 100 where the mourner is supposed to stop crying and learn to go on.

The way the religion is handled in the film doesn’t hit the viewer in the head; it makes sense and actually shows an angle to things that non-Buddhists may not know may not know very well. The temple scenes are shot in a very serene manner and are beautiful.  The rest of the film has a serious tone as well, but the temple scenes catch the eye in particular.  The scenes in Okinawa also do, but they are more comforting than serene.  This film is shot with such attention to details that it makes its runtime go faster and helps get the feelings through without becoming too heavy which is not an easy balance to achieve especially with such a subject.

Zinnia Flower is a film about death and the grieving process that works.  It’s not too heavy but shows the feelings and makes the viewer empathize with the characters.  It’s a beautiful and sad film, beautifully sad.  The title flower, the Zinnia, and what it represents is explained close to the end.  The story is touching and should make quite a few viewers cry.

Psychonauts, the Forgotten Children (2016) [Fantasia International Film Festival 2016]

PsychonautsI think audiences will enjoy the incessantly dreary and bleak tone of “Psychonauts, The Forgotten Children,” but for me it felt a step too heavy and morose and undercut a lot of the attempts at whimsy and absurd humor. “Psychonauts” is adapted from Alberto Vázquez’s independent Spanish language graphic novel “Psiconautas,” which featured the character Bird Boy, who starred in his own award winning short film from Vazquez. Bird Boy returns in the film as a side character who is relentlessly pursued by local officers, both of whom want him dead and will do whatever it takes to kill him, despite his seemingly innocent habit with “Happy pills” he’s dependent on to keep demons at bay.

Meanwhile mouse Dinky is desperate to run away from her adoptive family that pressures her to become an engineer, oblivious to the landfills outside of their town that involve rats. These rats look for copper to survive, and the tensions rise as the space for survival grows smaller. I had a love hate relationship with “Psychonauts.” Originally I was so excited to see it since the animation is absolutely beautiful, but it’s such a heavy handed and dire metaphor for poverty and conformity I was actually not entertained all that much. Granted, when I savored the brilliant animation style, I loved what Alberto Vazquez and Pedro Rivero had to offer audiences alike.

But once I dug in to the story, it was a pretty miserable experience with tales about scavenging rats, drug addicted bird boys, and young teenage mice with dark voices tempting them to murder their friends and family. Alberto Vázquez and Pedro Rivero’s “Psychonauts” is a haunting, very heavy animated film with stark political and social overtones. Those themes hobble it in some instances, sadly, muddying up the excellent animation, and richer more complex tale about madness, and looking for a purpose in a land where opportunity involves murder and or conformity.

post

Novaseed (2016) [Fantasia International Film Festival 2016]

NovaseedDirector Nick DiLiberto’s animated science fiction epic could be considered a part of a new “Heavy Metal” anthology if we ever get a remake any time soon. DiLiberto’s animated epic owes a lot to Ralph Bakshi and the sensibilities of the original animated movie, except without any of the exploitative and misogynist overtones. “Novaseed” is a classic hero journey tale of a mastermind rising to power in a post apocalyptic wasteland and one hero stepping up to stop him and save someone very special. When the world is threatened by the maniacal Dr. Mindskull, the government begins looking for champions to step up and challenge him.

DiLiberto pulls a switcheroo on us and a clever turning of the cliché, as he features a gladiator match with a lion-man who automatically becomes the film’s hero once he manages to step forward and prove his courage against his sword wielding foe. From there, hero Nac claims the enigmatic prize that everyone in the world is searching for, and is confronted with Mindskull who challenges Nac’s opposition. DiLiberto’s animation is very low budget and apparently seemed to be based around rotoscoping much in the way Ralph Bakshi exercised for his epics. While the apparent style is hard to discern at first glance, it becomes apparent and tends to elevate the material well.

Due to the low budget our hero Nac is, for the most part, mute for his time on film. Through this drawback, his character presents an action speaking louder than words movement with his character exposition until the very end. “Novaseed” is a strong and unique science fiction animated adventure that relies a lot on simplicity and recognizing its own limitations during the narrative. It has a very “Mad Max” and Bill Plympton sensibility to it with massive desert wastelands and futuristic warriors roaming the land and plundering while Nac seeks to escape the clutches of the government and battle Mindskull. All in all, it’s very much a tribute to the eighties underground animated films and one that I enjoyed, simply for its understanding of why Bakshi’s films stand out among the other animation in the medium.

If you love briskly paced, action packed, violent post apocalyptic sagas and with a rough around the edges sincerity, “Novaseed” will win you over as it did me.

Train To Busan (Bu-San-Haeng) (2016)

traintobusan“Train to Busan” is very much steeped in the idea of humans using the warped concepts of segregation and isolation as a means to survive, not only from the menaces lurking outside our doors, but inevitably from one another. Sook-woo is a hopelessly disconnected workaholic who is confined to his office desk and is still reeling from a bad divorce. Trying to rebound from a bad business deal with a local corporation, and re-connect with his estranged daughter Soo-ahn, he submits to her birthday plea of taking her to Busan on train to see her mother. Despite protesting against it initially, he accompanies her to see her mom. But much to his, and everyone’s surprise, a viral outbreak has exploded on to the train station turning the infected in to rabid, running, flesh eating zombies.

Continue reading

Batman: The Killing Joke (2016)

batman-killingjokeDC And Warner have at their hands one of the most iconic Batman narratives of all time, a narrative that asks the question if the Joker is truly someone too weak to endure a really awful life, or if he can submit someone to so much pain they can become exactly like him. All it takes is one bad day, he insists. “The Killing Joke” is surprisingly only seventy six minutes in length and still manages to feel way too long. For an iconic story with such a meaty premise, DC and Warner obviously have absolutely no idea how to put it to screen, and manage to botch this adaptation big time. With “The Killing Joke” we have to endure what is one long winded and dull prologue that leads literally to nowhere, just to allow the viewer to connect to heroine Batgirl.

Continue reading

post

Oklahoma! (1955)

The decision to hire Fred Zinnemann as the director of the film version of the Rodgers & Hammerstein musical “Oklahoma!” was peculiar – the director never helmed a musical before and was best known for his intensely riveting dramas such as “The Search,” “The Men,” “High Noon,” “The Member of the Wedding” and the Oscar-winning “From Here to Eternity.” One would imagine that bringing in a veteran musical director such as Stanley Donen or Vincente Minnelli would seem more logical for a vehicle like “Oklahoma!” – this would seem to be the job for an expert in the light and breezy, not in doom and gloom.

But Zinnemann’s predilection for the dramatic gave the frothy “Oklahoma!” a sense of complex gravitas that was absent from other mid-1950s musicals – not to mention the original Broadway production – and when viewing it today, it seems more modern when many of the other musicals of the decade seem badly dated. Part of this was achieved in the off-beat casting of Rod Steiger (who transformed the character Jud Fry from a stock villain into an emotionally tortured untouchable) and film noir diva Gloria Grahame (who played the comic relief Ado Annie without a trace of wink-and-nudge farce, thus making her character’s sexual cluelessness more humorously invigorating). Zinnemann might have taken the film into even darker territory, as witnessed in his unusual eagerness to audition non-musical young Method actors Paul Newman and James Dean for the Curly role. But under Zinnemann’s direction, Gordon MacRae, a usually bland musical-comedy performer, tapped into hitherto unknown dramatic abilities as he plumbed Curly to find an insouciant malevolence that clouded the character’s personality and motivation.

Still, “Oklahoma!” is a musical and not a melodrama, and Zinnemann responded to the material with an imaginative style that took full advantage of the widescreen format (the film was simultaneously filmed in the Todd-AO and CinemaScope processes) and vibrant rural locations (in Arizona, as Oklahoma proved oddly incompatible for the production). The classic score was wonderfully enhanced with boldly conceived outdoor sequences – “Oh, What a Beautiful Mornin’” and “The Surrey with the Fringe on Top” are playfully visualized while the complicated “Kansas City” dance number was staged with a large ensemble in an open air train depot. Zinnemann also provided expert framing for Agnes de Mille’s groundbreaking dream ballet, which offered an astonishing avant-garde sequence laced with psychosexual menace.

It also helped that the film brought in reliable performers to inhabit the broad roles with unapologetic hamming – Eddie Albert’s oleaginous Persian peddler, Gene Nelson as the handsome but dim cowboy and the sublime Charlotte Greenwood as the earthy Aunt Eller offer a jolly presence to keep Zinnemann’s edgier elements in check, creating the cinematic equivalent of a yin-yang balance. The biggest surprise was the film’s greatest gamble: putting unknown Shirley Jones in the central role of Laurey. The young actress was not lacking in photogenic charms and a fine voice, and Zinnemann carefully guided her through the role’s light comedy and difficult emotional turns, which resulted in one of the most startlingly effective film debuts.